Editorial
Most Americans Just Don't Get It
It bothers me to no end that millions of Americans simply don't get just how dangerous this current administration's views are, especially about the nature of our basic rights.
I suppose I should not be surprised, given the utterly perverted primary and secondary education most people receive now in their government run schools. After all, those very schools and everyone with a job in the system, depend upon the flat out rejection of the idea of our basic, natural rights spelled out in the Declaration of Independence. For if each of us does in fact have an unalienable right to our life, our liberty, our pursuit of our happiness and the rest, then those schools exist in direct contradiction to these rights. They are built with the loot the politicians and bureaucrats confiscate from the citizenry, loot that involves the violation of those basic rights the Declaration states every human being has!
So then in order to continue the confiscation of our resources with impunity at all levels of state, it is required that the confiscators deny those rights. And that is just what has transpired – in our era the White House and its legal team, lead by Harvard Law Professor Cass Sunstein, insist that government creates our rights, that we have none based on our human nature. If one complains about these people extorting from us our life-times and our property, i.e., a chunk of our very lives, the politicians and bureaucrats can retort that these are not really ours at all, we have no rights apart from what they decide we have! (This is exactly what some of the stars of contemporary political theory preach!) That is what it means to claim that government creates our rights and we have none based on our humanity! That is what it means to claim that instead of governments being instituted so as to secure our basic natural, prelegal rights, governments just happen to exist and do with us as they please, like monarchs, tsars, dictators, pharaohs and Caesars used to, proclaiming that they have the divinely obtained authority to do so. When Thomas Hobbes strove to defend the unlimited authority of government without appealing to its divine appointment, he retained the core authoritarian idea that genuine rights are the product of the sovereign's will and that, therefore, no subject could have rights against the sovereign. The anti-authoritarian resistance to tyrannical government that was manifested in 17th and 18th century Ango-American political history was grounded in the idea that government itself is subject to moral constraints that it neither creates nor can abrogate.
This is why this utter distortion of the nature of government and our basic rights must be something to which American citizens should pay the utmost attention instead of dosing through the experience. They do appear to be in a semi coma about it, except for a few, like Judge Napolitano at Fox-TV. But the vast majority are clueless about just how dangerous is the current administration's legal philosophy. Incredibly they behave like those sad peons of past centuries who tended to accept without much question that some human beings are mysteriously authorized to rule them and they have no justification to call this rule into question. All those ideas and ideals with which America had been associated, albeit even then not closely enough, about how when governments begin to act as tyrants they may be dismissed from their job, seem to have been forgotten. Instead the vast majority has come to accept their reactionary status as mere subjects to whom governments simply promise– though rarely deliver – various benefits in return for their silence and compliance.
Any protests, as put forth by some of the Tea Party people, are dismissed by the elite – writing in forums such as The New York Review of Books, The New York Times, etc. – with the sneers and snootiness of an untouchable elite. (And even the few well positioned conservative skeptics tend to refuse to truly challenge all this, apparently because they, too, want not to reaffirm universal, unalienable individual rights but to wrest power and establish their Right wing version of coercive statism.)
Although in the long haul there is still cause for some optimism – after all, the American system of government, dedicated as it was supposed to be, to the protection of the individual rights of the citizenry, is a very radical notion and its principles require a great deal of ongoing vigilance to be fully realized – for the time being it does appear that the truly exceptional Americanism that distinguished the country from those around the globe (including, especially, the European top down systems the Founders and Framers wanted to disown) is under full assault.
The currently fashionable European system of democratic socialism – which, in practice, comes to nothing else but a type of fascism – is all the rage in Washington. And this country's exceptional standing is now scoffed at by our political thinkers and leaders. It is time to wake up to this travesty and to do something decisive about it. And that must start in the hearts and minds of the citizenry.
Latest Daily Bell Articles
Feedback


Posted by Sunny on 09/10/10 03:09 AM
Whoa, it sounds like you are blaming the Patriot Act, with all of its intrusive, oppressive laws, on the current administration. GW Bush enacted all of that--- remember? And Bush started 2 wars, remember? And he bankrupted the coffers on his second day in office, remember? He left a lot to clean up after. And we were not free to criticize it openly--- remember? At least during this administration we are free to complain. That is progress, no matter how small. As for the school situation-- privatization is not progress. And I agree with "Bill": returning to the system of unchecked "ocracies" would be disastrous.
Posted by Mark Humphrey on 09/03/10 11:59 PM
So I was disappointed when he said, "What America needs is public leaders who will guide and protect us as a Shepard guards his flock." It was clear from the meaning of his remarks that he saw people as sheep, in need of herding (and from "necessity"--shearing). His observation was made sincerely—without a trace of cynicism.
This is the overriding political theme of our times. So often, people believe they are incapable of seeing, understanding and judging. They long for some Higher Authority to take responsibility.
I fail to understand the case for mild, long-range optimism, unless some calamity forces people to question and actually think.
I'm not rooting for calamity.
Posted by Adrian W. on 09/03/10 05:56 AM
Lets hope so!
Posted by Capt. A. on 09/01/10 04:11 PM
Don't think the American elite hasn't tried! I'm not sure that Prince Albert will uphold with the same fortitude, as his father, Prince Rainier III, the boundaries, the former might slip-up and essentially turn Monaco into a real crapshoot! I'd like to think this constitutional monarchy has the stones to finally say, "NO."
"No," was Rainier's answer to the OECD, the American government and all other governments etc. Some compromise has occurred. However, at least the maintenance of liberty, freedom and privacy lost will turn this 7-hundred-year old sovereignty into just another beggar's paradise. I can assure you the prince will watch his sovereignty slip away. The rich will not put up with any crap from even the prince or his cohorts. This much I know. And they (the Grimaldi entourage) know it too! Vigilance...
Otherwise, a true sucking sound will occur"the harbor in La Condamine will be a ghost town with slips empty. My experience here talking to wealth confirms this. Again, the rich will not tolerate this. One would trust that the prince is not an idiot"his advisors keeping him apprised of exactly what the pulse of the wealthy individual is and the senseless act of failing to understand the merits of his actions contrary. Woe.
Finally, the "vote" is non-existent in Monaco! It isn't a democracy! And that's a very good thing! PRICE is the segregator. Property rights exist. Privacy is a property right here. And on and on... Like the Italians do ... place your thumbnail squarely under your front tooth ... and flick it in Uncle Sam's sallow-jowled face! Capisce?
Regards,
Capt. A.
Principaute de Monaco
GMT 2:00 CET
Reply from The Daily Bell
The untold story of Monaco?
Posted by Capt. A. on 09/01/10 02:46 PM
The grandson thought about it for a minute and then asked his grandfather: "Which wolf wins?" The old Cherokee replied, "The one you feed."
*********************
A couple of days ago ... I placed this paragraph at the end of a comment I made:
The danger to America is not Barack Obama, but a citizenry capable of entrusting a man like him with the Presidency. It will be far easier to limit and undo the follies of an Obama presidency than to restore the necessary common sense and good judgment to a depraved electorate willing to have such a man for their president. The problem is much deeper and far more serious than Mr. Obama, who is a mere symptom of what ails America. Blaming the prince of the fools should not blind anyone to the vast confederacy of fools that made him their prince. The Republic can survive a Barack Obama... who is, after all, merely a fool. It is less likely to survive a multitude of fools such as those who made him their president. " Author unknown
*********************
To the critical thinker, it should be readily apparent especially now that the lamentable experiment conducted in America starting around the inception of the U.S. Constitution two-hundred and twenty-one years ago with its geometrical diminution of individual freedom and liberty, has failed. (Maybe not says the voter!)
I left the States over thirty-years ago. I saw the inexorable diminishment. I was vigilant. I paid a dear price to get out of the growing onslaught of an ever-growing beast, the U.S. government. I failed miserably in trying to convince those individuals close ... to follow. None did. I've watched this wretched thugatarian government from afar grow vote-by-vote.
The American government-controlled school system cited by Dr. Machan, by preponderance, has tipped the scales toward a growing true disaster. But little else need be said. Getting out of a jurisdiction rife with growing horror just doesn't rest well with those individuals that seemingly believe in "hope, have faith, patriotism, praying or voting and say, "If only..."
I say, "Most people dream away their lives with the illusion that everything would be perfect"if only..." Shear poppycock!
A resident here in Monaco, some of you might know from his long ago statement: "Everything the government touches turns to crap." Yep, the venerable Ringo Starr! He nailed it! He and many, many others including moi, left countries with growing untenable thug bases.
Maybe you too should consider exactly what your individual freedom, liberty and privacy etc., is really worth and create 'circumstance' necessary to preserve it. Maybe not. Only you can answer that.
C'est la guerre.
Capt. A.
Principaute de Monaco
GMT 2:00 CET
Reply from The Daily Bell
Unfortunately, the elite seems intent on subverting America not Monaco. Why?
Posted by David on 09/01/10 01:22 PM
Thank you for writing/speaking/sharing, and stepping-up to the plate. Couldn't have said it better.
I copied and emailed your article to 295 members of my local Bay Area Meet-up activist group.
And many of them will send it to their groups, subgroups, friends/family, significant others, etc., etc.
Long live the global/worldwide web.
Posted by Sundaymorning on 09/01/10 10:34 AM
Reply from The Daily Bell
"What then secures our natural rights?"
What' your point? If people don't believe in God, the state should take over?
Posted by James E McMullen III on 08/31/10 11:39 PM
A democratic-republic has proven to be a good example, though over the past almost 100 years our form of government has been infected with a cancer called progressivism, liberalism or whatever you want to call it.
Those sitting in many key positions in our government today were the vandals, anarchist, bomb throwing saboteurs during tumultuous Vietnam War era. They occupy not only the government bureaucracy by academe reaching as far down our education chain as are grade schools and even kindergartens. They despise the individual as described by our Founding Fathers. Even the illegal occupant of 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue despises our Founding Fathers and the documents that prescribe the basis of our government and our country.
Posted by Fred on 08/31/10 01:26 PM
From my point of view, the political, economic, social issues facing America cannot be solved for several reasons. The main one, of course, is the fact that we are a divided nation, unable to agree on most anything. The decline of the United States will continue unfortunately.
Posted by Mary Boud on 08/31/10 12:34 PM
He declares, "The currently fashionable European system of democratic socialism ‒ which, in practice, comes to nothing else but a type of fascism ‒ is all the rage in Washington." And yet, he expresses optimism of the American system, knowing as did the Founders, that citizens must be vigilant against those who would subvert the realization that our 'rights' derive from Divine Providence and not from government whose role is to defend those rights rather than obstruct them.
Various groups and individuals are striving to stir this essential vigilance. One such, is the much maligned Glenn Beck. The following sites describe something about him (some in good humor) and his 'Restoring Honor' rally of this past weekend which was in full support of Dr. Machan's views and warnings. Still, too many observers do not realize that we in the U.S. are fighting for our lives and liberty.
ttp://Click to view link
– an excerpt: "with firm reliance on divine providence," those citizens who still believe in the ideals of the founders and the dream of the civil rights movement are preparing to wrest control from those who would turn these principles on their heads."
Click to view link
It is my understanding that C-SPAN is going to replay 'the rally' next Monday (don't know the time) if anyone wants to see and hear for themselves rather than listen to pundits.
As Dicken's Tiny Tim once said, "God bless us everyone."
Posted by Jesse Townsley on 08/31/10 07:11 AM
The fact is that the hearts and minds of most Americans leans to how much largesse they can derive from the public treasury, and freedom, liberty, and personal responsibility are subjects quite foreign to their belief systems.
However, we are still technically a constitutional republic, with three departments of government: i.e. executive, legislative, and judicial, each of which is supposed to watch the others closely for signs of usurpation of powers not granted to them. This responsibility has been shirked by each, and so we have no one in authority who is watching our backs. But, the courts are derived directly from the Constitution, and each judge swears an oath to uphold and defend the constitution. We need to force them to do it.
I have created a new profession which I have named "Constitutional Law Advocate". This is a kind of "super lawyer" who has shunned the present day laws schools in favor of wielding the law of the Constitution as a weapon. While this post was not described in the Constitution per se, its need can be implied from the mandate in the Declaration giving the People the right to throw out any government that does not protect their Rights to Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness.
I am currently testing this concept in three lawsuits I have instigated against the Pennsylvania DOT regarding the Uniform Motor Vehicle Code. I believe the Code is illegal because it takes away the right of citizen-drivers to make rational decisions and substitutes the judgment of "law enforcement" in its place. This very action reduces driver responsibility and increases the accident rate, among other evil results. My plan is to force the Judge in the appeals court to accept that he must, under his own oath, pay heed to his responsibility to protect the Rights of the People, and not to protect the power of the government.
I have three cases scheduled to be heard on September 28th. It will be interesting to see how the judge handles my attack on what amounts, at the present time, to a 'kangaroo court'.
Wish me luck!
Posted by Ben Edes on 08/31/10 01:23 AM
There is too much at stake for the power elite to go quietly. Until the masses are awakened, little will change. The tea party has been hijacked by statist neo-cons as the saga of duress continues.
Nullification is the only path to asserting natural rights, one must be willing to defend their own as well as their neighbors Liberty, when all the kings horses and all his henchmen arrive.
Posted by S. on 08/31/10 12:01 AM
Posted by Kevin Beck on 08/30/10 10:54 PM
Posted by William on 08/30/10 07:23 PM
How is a populace, now mostly socialist in training at socialist dominated academia, (a huge mistake) expected to suddenly understand the constitution, let alone vote to end their own socialist redistribution dividend? They will not as long as a return to fascism is the alternative.
This battle was lost when no one spoke up when the fascists negated the constitution by extending the rights of individuals to corporations, something that was never intended by the founders. The present coalition of fascism and socialism is a direct consequence of allowing the corporations legal rights of individuals in perpetuity. Until this is changed, defeating socialism will only deliver us back to fascism and the next round of populist reaction to fascism.
Tea Party not withstanding, America is far too fat, dumb and happy to take the trouble to prevent its own demise. This is the greatest shame, ever, in the history of mankind.
Posted by GrammaSheila on 08/30/10 07:20 PM
Posted by Mpresley on 08/30/10 06:25 PM
For Hobbes there existed a personal natural right--the so-called right of nature, which entailed a judgment about whatever was necessary in order to preserve one's life. Natural law (that is, what is determined by reason) only then postulates the idea of civil community divorced from the state of nature. Once civil community is established, the citizen then has a duty to obey the sovereign. The sovereign is not a party to the contract, but plays the role of each individual that was once in nature. To disobey the sovereign would be, in effect, to disobey one's own true wishes. Or so it was argued.
In any case, what is interesting to me in all of this is the idea outlined in Hobbes' 9th Law of Nature: the equality of all men. Certainly Hobbes did not understand this equality the way modern liberals do (whether conservative or leftist in orientation); but his was certainly one of the first, if not the first, arguments establishing the groundwork for a liberal equalitarian social order.
Classical natural law theorists understood man's actual unequal nature better than we moderns, and because of it never argued for social equality as any kind of desirable goal.
Posted by MK on 08/30/10 06:00 PM
Posted by BigAl on 08/30/10 05:04 PM
A passion for the Constitution is what it is all about and it will take time to undo the damage and get the message across.
Speaking of time; in 1848 a small group folks recognized a Federal Government threat to their liberty and set a goal to correct.
One hundred sixty two (162) years later it is still work in progress BUT checkout the progress. The Daily Bell, staff, guests, thousands of feed backers, Tea Party, Ron Paul, thousands more, the web and internet. That is progress. We are just about there
Now the folks of 1848 invite you all to learn about their Constitution Day Webcast scheduled for September 16, 17.
Link Click to view link
Thanks
Posted by JQ on 08/30/10 03:32 PM
"The currently fashionable European system of democratic socialism
' Click to view linkes to nothing else but a type of FASCISM ' is all the rage in Washington. And this country's exceptional standing is now scoffed at by our political thinkers and leaders. It is time to wake up to this travesty and to do something decisive about it. And that must start in the hearts and minds of the citizenry."
This is what you get with a Harvard degree....a dummying down and a desire to replicate Europe who for decades embraced the nutty PC thinking that they could take in other countries while having one of the lowest birth rates around. Now it is biting them bigtime in the buns as they are being overrun by those breeding like rabbits.
Add to that, the equally nutty thinking that we all pay for one another's whatever we need, be that healthcare, etc, and you have a recipe for a revolution. And, this admin wants to emulate this?
Only in America, the home of the no longer free, can you get a degree to give every other citizen the third degree. Europe never learned their lesson and now we want to copy that system!! Let me say this, you know you are in the circus, when you're stepping in the elephant manure.
|
|

l 

