News & Analysis
Elite Desperation Over Failing Middle East Psyops
Once again, the power elite manipulates the Middle East for its own gain. It is a dangerous game, especially in Egypt, which controls the Suez Canal. Because of the violence, gold is up and oil, too. And just as I finish writing this article, the UK Telegraph has released an extraordinary story. It claims that the United States leadership not only secretly backed the current uprisings in Egypt, it was actively aiding and abetting the protestors. Hello rewrite!
"America's secret backing for rebel leaders behind uprising," the article reads. It explains that The American Embassy in Cairo helped a young dissident attend a US-sponsored summit for activists in New York. "On his return to Cairo in December 2008, the activist told US diplomats that an alliance of opposition groups had drawn up a plan to overthrow President Hosni Mubarak and install a democratic government in 2011."
What an expose! Unfortunately the story is developed from cables recently leaked by WikiLeaks. And here at the Bell, we don't trust WikiLeaks. Julian Assange himself may be an asset of Western intel. Of course, from the perspective of Western intel, tying Egyptian yearnings for independence to WikiLeaks may have seemed a brilliant stroke. Perhaps they believe it provides both WikiLeaks and the American ruling establishment with enormous credibility: Each can be seen as supporting freedom.
But on a deeper level, it reveals the desperation and the unraveling of this entire operation. The Anglo-American power elite has apparently decided to destablize the Middle East in order to create regulatory democracies with an Islamic tinge (an arrogant assumption in my view). The ultimate goal is to butress the war on terror and deliver enhanced authoritarianism to the West – and the Western middle classes that are always the targets of the elite.
But as usual, the Internet has apparently upset elite plans. How does one run a "black ops" of this magnitude while being exposed in real time? In fact, WikiLeaks could have released these cables at any point. They did it yesterday, apparently. It is as if the collective hand of the elite has been forced.
Yes, it seems to me that with plans exposed, Western elites may have decided to take credit for the Middle Eastern uprisings. Why is it a desperate manuever? Because the averge youthful Egyptian or Tunisian is not going to look kindly on the idea that he and his world is being manipulated yet again by ruthless Western powers-that-be. This is the reason that such operations are usually kept quiet. Nobody likes to feel manipulated.
What now? We continually document the struggle between the truth-telling of the Internet and the fear-based promotions of the elite. The elite seems increasingly tortured by the Internet, which is a process not an episode. Usually elite promotions take decades to develop. The EU was 50 years in the making. Global warming nearly as long. But everything the elite is trying to do these days regarding its promotional methodologies has a rushed, error-prone feel about it.
It is not going to help relations with the Egyptian man-on-the-street to have the information broadcast that America was behind – and actively planning – the current disturbances. As of this writing, the Egyptian government has lodged a protest against American interference. US Foggy Bottom types have taken to the airwaves blathering about the "values" of American democracy, but after years of reports of American torture, Western rendition, endless drone attacks that kill women and children in Afghanistan, it's certainly an open question as to whether America can effectively pose as a beacon of democratic values.
The ramifications are endless. Exposed endlessly on the Internet, the elite may have decided to take credit for the "democratization." But do the Western powers-that-be really believe they control these uprisings now? A dozen powder kegs have been lit. Blowback – serious blowback – is on the way. In a sense, no matter how the elite's involvement is portrayed, it would seem a botch. If you are going to destabilize some of the most ancient cultures in the world, you better be able to do it secretly. It's not something you want to take credit for, or not while the operations are ongoing.
Perhaps the disclosure was planned all along to give WikiLeaks additional credibility (which it sorely needs). But the trouble is that on the ‘Net anyway there has been enormous speculation that neither Assange nor WikiLeaks are exactly what they seem. Thus, WikiLeak's release of documents about American involvement may be viewed as manipulative itself ... artificial and even unconvincing. Here are some previous Bell articles on the subject:
http://www.thedailybell.com/1717/Fall-of-Saudi-Arabia-to-End-Dollar-Reserve-System.html
http://www.thedailybell.com/1714/Tunisia-Promotion-Now-Failing.html
http://www.thedailybell.com/1711/As-Predicted-Tunisian-Islamists-Emerge.html
http://www.thedailybell.com/1691/Western-Elites-Secretly-Still-Building-Islam.html
Credit where credit is due. The above articles have benefited from the insights of reporter and author William Engdahl who understands well the essential manipulation of the late 20th century world by the powers that be. In his book Full Spectrum Domination, he pointed out that the various color revolutions that occurred after the fall of the Soviet Union were essentially manipulated affairs.
He tells us that the leading actors in these revolutions were essentially coached by the CIA and other Western intelligence agencies. The end result was essentially a series of bloodless coup d'etats that left leaders sympathetic to Western style regulatory democracy in charge of the affected countries. What is going on in the Middle East is no different.
But Engdahl, as bright and sophisticated as he is, seems to see the world through a quasi-socialist prism. For him, it is governments orchestrating events and large, evil corporations coming up with the ideas that governments and fatcat politicians then orchestrate. That is why he mentions that it is the Rand Corporation that he claims came up with the idea for the current crop of "bloodless" revolutions. Our point of view is different. We ask who stands BEHIND corporations and governments. You can see a Bell article on Engdahl here:
http://www.thedailybell.com/1272/Western-Wars-Are-Preplanned.html
It seems fairly obvious that a Western power elite stands behind much of what goes on in the world today. There are central banks around the world, and they didn't happen by accident. The world's entire financial infrastructure was created by certain elite individuals after the Second World War, although the plans were drafted well in advance. To claim the world is run by "governments" is to miss the point. It is run by powerful banking families and their allies – mostly out of London – using the levers of power that governments provide to the truly wealthy. The mechanism of this governance is called mercantilism.
Elites are always at war with their middle classes, and the preferred techniques, in this epoch anyway, are the fear-based dominant social themes that the Bell tries to cover every day. By using these fear-based promotions, the elite attempts to stampede the middle class into surrendering both wealth and power. There is pressure for constant convergence of power; the preferred governance is regulatory democracy. In the Middle East, no doubt, the evolution of these revolutions will bring to power moderate Islamic entities that will provide a boon to yet another elite promotion: the so-called war on terror. All these promotions are interlinked.
There are other sorts of promotions that the elite uses as well, mostly to piggyback onto existing trends. WikiLeaks and Julian Assange would seem to be one of them. Aljazeera would seem to be another. Aljazeera was initially staffed by the BBC; Assange has released few leaks that harm Western powers in any significant way. By promoting Assange and Aljazeera, the elite is able to control the larger dialogue. It is a version of the Hegelian dialectic that the elite loves to use. Control both sides of the argument and the results are bound to further one's agenda, whatever it may be.
In this case, the goal is creating much closer and better-coordinated world government run by the Anglosphere. That's why we've suggested at the Bell that one of the outcomes of the Middle East unrest will likely be Islamic governments of a sort that will polarize public opinion in the West and add credibility to the current war on terror – which definitely needs a pick-me-up. If the West is to continue down the path of authoritarianism, it certainly needs to create a larger Islamic bogeyman.
It also seems to me that these revolutions could be used to destabilize a strong American ally, Saudi Arabia – and thus destabilize the dollar-reserve currency as well. (We've written about that.) Again, this benefits an Anglo-American power elite that is determined to transition from national currencies to one global currency – reason enough for the destruction of the dollar. The wealthiest sheiks won't be damaged were this to occur. They'll simply seek asylum in Britain, (or perhaps France) as so many of the West's wealthiest allies seem to do when they are toppled.
We live in the age (era) of the Internet. The manipulations of the elite have withstood the test of time, but I would suggest that in the 21st century there is a greater perception of the manipulations than ever before. The Internet was not foreseen by the elite. So many of elite promotions are compromised now; when the elite releases a new one, it would seem that the law of unintended consequences almost immediately takes hold.
In the 20th century, the elite controlled the message and thus much of the world. In the 21st century, the power of the Internet has exposed many of these promotions and given us real insight into the current matrix of control. I have this to say about the current color revolutions: Be careful what you wish for!
l 
|
You must be a site member to submit suggested edits or post feedback. In addition to submitting edit suggestions and posting feedback, your Free Membership to The Daily Bell gives you access to our Member Zone where you will discover a plethora of other member benefits. Want to learn more? click here |
|||||
|
|
||||
 |
Posted by Isa on 02/13/11 04:53 PM
Go back on your meds.
|
Posted by Trapped Rat on 02/04/11 07:25 PM
Very insightful!
Obama is a worldwide socialist who wishes to bring America down, because that must happen in the overall elitists' plan. America has proven to be a more resilient "patient" than they thought.
So it's time to step up the tempo. The poison must be injected into America's veins in a heavier dose so America weakens faster. These changes in the Middle East and N. Africa will surely do it!
At the end of the day, we'll realize that we are mere peasants. So enjoy your children, and the wife of your youth. Fear and obey God, and realize that we will all go the way of mankind someday. Indeed, prepare on earth to ride the hard life that is coming. But more importantly, but prepared to meet God for eternity.
|
Posted by Tom Beach on 02/02/11 12:14 PM
Full Spectrum Domination is not available in our library. It is available to buy from Amazon at $45! Too bad I will not be reading it.
However, The Creature from Jekyll Island is available from the library and reveals much of what you intimate in this article.
Basically, we are being manipulated for the benefit of the power elite of the world. The one world order is the objective and the domination of that order by the extremely wealthy is the goal.
The names and purpose of the power elite are hidden so that the common folk like us will not know or be able to resist the thrust of their plans. If you do not know what is happening how can you object to it?
|
Posted by Memehunter1 on 01/31/11 03:11 PM
@ Vaaung
No, I had never read that the Rockefellers were Khazars (note that I said that the accounts were "similar"). The Rockefellers were originally crypto-Jews, more specifically Marranos (though I think that they are more likely to be Satanists at this point). You can verify online for yourself, there are numerous sources (I cannot vouch for their reliability).
Regarding the murder of the four Rockfeller brothers, I have no strong opinion, but I note that the use of doubles has been discussed at length on the web. Peter Beter, for instance, has given fairly detailed accounts of this and is an author I consider worth reading (transcripts of his audio tapes are available online), though I'll admit that some of his claims seem downright extravagant in my view.
On the role played by Zionists elements on the course of world history in the first part of the 20th century (with particular emphasis on Einstein), I suggest the following book:
The manufacture and sale of Saint-Einstein, by Christopher Jon Bjerknes
A monster of 2826 pages, with extensive quotations from primary sources of the period such as newspaper articles and letters.
I have not finished it yet but I can already say that it is a must read. Incidentally, this book may lead you to revisit your opinion of science and scientists, or, at the very least, be more cautious before you say that a scientific study has definitively "debunked" something.
Reply from The Daily Bell
Einstein apparently "borrowed" some of this theories ...
|
Posted by Bill Ross on 01/31/11 09:57 AM
Folks;
I consider the groupthink and ethnic orgins (implying allegiance) that this thread has veered off to, to be a subset of the profound ignorance of gross generalizations that elites wish us to conceptualize reality and our fellow inmates in terms of, forever keeping the truth out of reach (intellectually dividing and conquering us).
Social reality is not about ethnic or any groups based on physical or genetic characteristics (Men are from Mars, Women from Venus, etc), it is about individuals and organized groups performing actions with consequences in our action preceding consequence reality. Criminals are individuals and groups defined by criminal actions, not ethnicity.
Introduction from:
Click to view link
"To an overall observer, civilization appears to be a seething mass of humanity engaged in un-coordinated activities, some building, some destroying, some just trying to survive and everyone competing with no overall pattern discernible. A closer look reveals that there is structure; civilization is a collection of groups, each performing some function. There still seems to be no overall goals and much conflict between groups. A still closer look reveals that each group has characteristics strongly influenced by the function it performs. Each seems to have limited skills and knowledge, restricted to what is required to perform its function. Each group seems to consider all other groups as threatening, ignorant, untrustworthy and less worthy than itself.
As with any large, complex dynamic system, civilization must be broken into components in order to allow its operation to be understood and described in terms of the behavior of the components. Although this analysis is presented in terms the average high school graduate should be able to understand, enough information is provided to define parameters and form mathematical equations to allow a computer simulation to be designed."
End Intro to TRUTH.
THINK about it:
Click to view link
Ethnicity and genealogy may be interesting topics, but, in terms of the nature of individuals and the choices they make, it is irrelevant. What is relevant is environment and experiences which determines the perceptual reality upon which choice is based:
Click to view link
THIS is NOT rocket science.
|
Posted by 4irw4y on 01/31/11 09:31 AM
OK, real History is here, sharpen your swords/shine your keyboards. DB, please find this invitation on another topics. Be patient and... rewarded. Click to view link re 1/31/2011 9:20:12 AM, thanks.
|
Posted by Vauung on 01/31/11 08:53 AM
@ Timur the Lame
"Did the genomic study differentiate between Sephardic and Ahskenazi jews?"
If you mean the study mentioned by Nicholas Wade (I referred to another by Cochran and others previously on this thread), it doesn't emphasize Ashkenazi / Sephardi difference. The Cochran et al study focuses on Ashkenazi Jews. IQ studies seem to suggest there are significant genetic differences, but the Khazar link (as a major factor) seems to be mythical (your understanding of Ashkenazi ancestry has not been substantiated by genetic profiling). The Excellent Gene Expression site is a good place to fill in the details:
Click to view link
My 'antisemitic' and 'swamp' references are easily understood if you google 'Khazar Jewish'. You are immediately plunged into some pretty feverish places. I certainly didn't mean to impugn all conspiracy theory, even less all HBD study, and I apologize if that was the impression.
I usually avoid the NYT like the plague, but Nicholas Wade is very honest and reliably interesting. His books are also superb.
|
Posted by 4irw4y on 01/31/11 06:34 AM
Khazar Kaganat was situated on the territory of the modern Russia, SW from Urals, before baptising of several major trade and military regions under unified rule. Presently, it's just slightly studied @schools in Russia. They, as stated, have lost their semitic identity.
|
Posted by Timur The Lame on 01/31/11 06:07 AM
@ Vauung
Did the genomic study differentiate between Sephardic and Ahskenazi jews?
Of course Koestler who was jewish wrote probably the best known book on the subject- 'The Thirteenth Tribe' but I stumbled upon a book at a used bookstore called 'A History of Russia' by George Vernadsky (1954 edition), professor of Russian history in the Yale University in which he states:
..." Though the Arabs offered them [the Khazars] Islam and the Greeks Christianity, the Khazar kagan possibly for political reasons, was reluctant to accept either, fearing that a foreign faith might well be followed by foreign domination. He solved the dilema eventually by choosing a neutral faith, Judaism, which carried with it no political threat."...
This book was originally written in 1929 and my edition was the the third revision. This seems to be plenty of time for a scholar in a peer reviewed vocation to correct any errors.
How could one then explain that originally desert dwellers used to an arid climate all of a sudden find the great majority of their numbers in relatively inhospitable cold climates of Poland and Lithuania?
Your reference to scholarship as being 'anti-semetic' and people who questions things as residing in a 'swamp' could be considered as revealing as to your mandate.
My understanding is that Ashkenazi descended from Khazars and Sephardim are Semetic (as per Zen's source).
I have not followed the links so feel free to correct me if necceasy but not with the NYT. BTW- science is vey political these days, read the NIST report.
Regards-
 |
Posted by AmanfromMars on 01/31/11 05:55 AM
That tale of Memehunter1's ... Posted by Memehunter1 on 1/31/2011 1:33:34 AM .... elevates Vladimir Vladimirovich Putin to an altogether much more exalted and distinguished plane.
There was no doubting earlier that he is an extremely intelligent and able man [one merely needs to listen to his lengthy State of the Nation type question and answer exercises to understand that] but to know that he is also extremely SMART too, is whole new ball game for those into such ARG Design ..... and opens up a whole new book to be written in the evolution of the Great Game, if/as the West is to continue on its discredited paths and bury its collective heads in the sand, and act as if nothing has changed with the East Ascendant and Rising to Glorious Levels and Fabulous Heights.
 |
Posted by Zenbillionaire on 01/31/11 04:40 AM
@ DB
"Are you sure modern genomics has debunked the history of Khazar Jews?"
I Don't know much about the Khazar Jews, but it is pretty well established that there's no difference between Jews and Arabs from a purely biological perspective.
"What they revealed was that Arabs and Jews are essentially a single population, and that Palestinians are slap bang in the middle of the different Jewish populations (as shown in this figure)."
Click to view link
This result has been reported and confirmed multiple times. It isn't a myth to the best of my knowledge.
|
Posted by Vauung on 01/31/11 02:57 AM
"Are you sure modern genomics has debunked the history of Khazar Jews?"
The antisemitic myth, which I'm sure you're familiar with (since you have to tackle strange creatures from the conspiracy swamps on a regular basis), is that the dominant part of modern Jewry is of Khazar rather than original Middle Eastern ancestry. Genetic studies have shown that to be untrue, to a level of confidence typical of solid scientific evidence (if not metaphysical certainty -- but who wants that?).
|
Posted by Leg1 on 01/31/11 02:08 AM
The Current Color is Clear. Hail the Emperor's New Veil!
|
Posted by Vauung on 01/31/11 01:51 AM
@ Memehunter
"I can attest to having read at least two detailed accounts very similar to the above in sources completely unrelated to those provided by Ron Chapman and that I consider to be reliable."
-- and they are?
Forgive my suspicions, but I know for sure that the "Khazar Jews" myth has been debunked by modern genomics:
Click to view link
The rest of the story contains a number of highly implausible elements, so some supporting evidence would be nice.
Reply from The Daily Bell
Are you sure modern genomics has debunked the history of Khazar Jews?
|
Posted by Memehunter1 on 01/31/11 01:33 AM
"As regards the existence of the Soviet Union, "yes" it did exist. It was created by Lenin, Trotsky and other Jewish agents of the Rothschilds called 'Bolsheviks' and maintained with massive material and military support by the US, courtesy of the Rockefellers, who, like the Rothschilds, were of Khazar Jewish origins.
John Davison Rockefeller was initially financed by the Rothschilds but outgrew them in the US and Western Hemisphere, and the Pacific area. Thus the Rockefellers became independent but remained in alliance with the Rothschilds AND the Bolshevik Jews who controlled the Soviet Union from October 1917 until all four Rockefeller brothers were murdered (with two of them being replaced by doubles) by Bolshevik Jews who were forced to flee the Soviet Union in the late 1970s as a result of a coup by a secret Christian group there.
The Bolsheviks then took over much of the US administration and Pentagon. The Rockefeller Cartel had to regroup and is still contesting with Bolsheviks for control of the US. Now Russia is finally free of the murderous Jewish Bolsheviks, as Putin has eliminated the Wall Street backed Jewish mafia that plundered Russia in the 1990s and the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics has been disbanded."
Not that it proves anything, but I can attest to having read at least two detailed accounts very similar to the above in sources completely unrelated to those provided by Ron Chapman and that I consider to be reliable. As far as I am concerned, I have no reason to doubt that this is truthful (or at least, "more truthful" than the mainstream view of history). This should not be necessarily be construed as indicating that I am in agreement with all of Ron Chapman's arguments or opinions.
Reply from The Daily Bell
We tend to agree with you and Chapman as well, though the "murder" of the Rockefellers is not something we had ever read before. But one can present this sort of history without impugning all Jews. This is where we part company, especially, with Chapman and the like.
|
Posted by Gethky on 01/31/11 01:20 AM
@DB
"We are not 'blaming the messenger for the message.' We are simply suggesting that WikiLeaks and Assange in particular may constitute something of a false flag. Increasingly, his actions and that of WikiLeaks seem to bear out this supposition. Gethky, you apparently have trouble understanding this point of view as you have queried it at least three times. Why don't you show it to a trusted friend and see if she/he can explain it you."
Now I get it! You don't blame the messenger, but you do suspect the messenger. Right?
Reply from The Daily Bell
Yes.
|
Posted by Axiom on 01/31/11 01:14 AM
Maybe this IS the psy-op to further anger arabs encouraging more muslim militism hence greater war on terror "measures"
Reply from The Daily Bell
Well, you have pretty well summed up in a single sentence what we have been arguing in numerous articles over weeks. Good for you.
|
Posted by Ron Chapman on 01/30/11 11:56 PM
@ DB
'1. In the US there used to be a free-market but is not one now. This does not invalidate the free-market or human action'.
Surely you jest?
I didn't say 'the free-market' and/or free 'human action' was "invalid". I simply indicated that the US has not operated under such.
-Appearances are of four kinds.
Things either are as they appear to be;
or they neither are nor appear to be;
or they are, but do not appear to be;
or they are not, and yet, appear to be.
- Epictatus :)
"If you can create money out of nothing... you don't have to charge a lot of interest on it to make a profit."* " G. Edward Griffin
The US started life as a series of colonies all of which were under the thumb of the British monarchy which licenced various fictive entities (ie "companies") to establish colonies. As the colonies developed they were required to use British money issued by the Bank of England (a private usurious banking monopoly granted in 1694) and to pay interest on that money. Moreover, colonists had to pay taxes USING that money which the bankers ensured would be in short supply.
The War of Independence was fought because the British insisted that Colonial Scrip ' money issued by the colonies in sufficient quantities to enable full employment (but not in excess so that inflation did not DEVALUE the money and cause an economic boom/bust cycle) ' CEASE TO BE USED.
Within a year the colonies experienced gross unemployment and poverty, hence the War. The colonists would gladly have paid a small tax on tea etc IF they could retain their own money creation and supply system so that they could maintain full employment and hence prosperity.
After the War the British bankers used agents to get Congress to accept the establishment of a "Central" bank to be used by the US government. The first and second such banks were, over time, abolished by Congress but the third, the Federal Reserve System (the Fed) still functions to enforce usury, inflation, currency devaluation and unemployment on USans.[1] An attempt was made to assassinate President Andrew Jackson, probably because of his opposition to the retention of the second US Central bank (but typically this incident like others, has been "sold"by the mainstream media as just another inexplicable 'lone nut' event like Lee Harvey Oswald et al).
President Lincoln was assassinated because he created government money (greenbacks) with which he financed the North during the Civil War instead of borrowing money from the banksters at interest rates of 28% pa.[1] Similarly, JFK was assassinated (partly) because he was going to bring back the "greenback" and hence undermine the Fed.
The impact on the US economy of of J D Rockefeller and his clan and other plutocrats in the 19th and 20th century, also gives the lie to the suggestion that the US was a "free" market then.
In July 1862, in the middle of the Civil War, the Hazard circular was sent by London banksters to US banksters. It said:
`Slavery is likely to be abolished by the war power and chattel slavery destroyed. This I and my European friends are in favor of, for slavery is but the owning of labor and carries with it the care of the laborers, while the European plan, led by England, is that capital [the bankers] shall control labor by controlling wages. This can be done by controlling the money. The great debt (national) that capitalists will see to it is made out of the war, must be used as a means to control the volume of money. To accomplish this the war bonds must be used as a banking basis. We are now waiting for the Secretary of the Treasury to make this recommendation to Congress.'
The US Congress passed the National Bank Act of 1863 giving the banksters power to create money as debt, but not exclusively. In 1872 Horace Greeley said of the Act:
`We have stricken the shackles from four million beings and brought all laborers to a common level, not so much by the elevation of the former slaves as by practically reducing the whole working population, white and black, to a condition of serfdom. While boasting of our noble deeds we are careful to conceal the ugly fact that by our iniquitous money system we have nationalized a system of oppression which, though more refined, is not less cruel than the old system of chattel slavery.'
Comment: That doesn't sound like a 'free-market' or free 'human action.' To me.
In 1920 Colonel Edward Mandell House is said to have given a very detailed outline of the plans to be implemented to complete the enslavement of the American people. He stated, in a private meeting with Woodrow Wilson (President 1913 ' January 1921):
'Very soon, every American will be required to register their biological property (that's you and your children) in a national system designed to keep track of the people and that will operate under the ancient system of pledging. By such methodology, we can compel people to submit to our agenda, which will affect our security as a charge back for our fiat paper currency.
'Every American will be forced to register or suffer being able to work and earn a living. They will be our chattels (property) and we will hold the security interest over them forever, by operation of the law merchant under the scheme of secured transactions. Americans, by unknowingly or unwittingly delivering the bills of lading (Birth Certificate) to us will be rendered bankrupt and insolvent, secured by their pledges.
'They will be stripped of their rights and given a commercial value designed to make us a profit and they will be none the wiser, for not one man in a million could ever figure our plans and, if by accident one or two should figure it out, we have in our arsenal plausible deniability. After all, this is the only logical way to fund government, by floating liens and debts to the registrants in the form of benefits and privileges. This will inevitably reap us huge profits beyond our wildest expectations and leave every American a contributor to this fraud, which we will call "Social Insurance." Without realizing it, every American will unknowingly be our servant, however begrudgingly. The people will become helpless and without any hope for their redemption and we will employ the high office (presidency) of our dummy corporation (USA) to foment this plot against America.'
The Great Depression created by the Fed's monetary policy was the proximate cause of the bankruptcy of the US and virtually all other nations around the world in the 1930s. To be "free" a "market" AND human agents, must not be manipulated and controlled. The US has never been a free market nor have its people ever been free " they have been manipulated and deluded since a bunch of elitists formulated the constitution to replace the Articles of Confederation and Perpetual Union. See for example:
Click to view link
And:
Click to view link
(1) For more details see:
Click to view link
Reply from The Daily Bell
You might wish to receive your history from someone other than Ellen Brown. Gary North is a good place to start.
|
Posted by Dogwood on 01/30/11 09:59 PM
Amazing how quickly all news sources established consensus on the reason for the revolts. Similar to how the European press picked up the "civility" consensus... I mean meme... Within days.
|
Posted by Vauung on 01/30/11 09:51 PM
"You can find a definition of "meme" at the Daily Bell."
Thanks. For those who don't know where to find it (like me 5 minutes ago), it's in the Resources section. Very useful and clarifying.
|
|
