News & Analysis
Does the Elite Need a False Flag?
Panetta to inherit Afghanistan dilemma ... With Americans still coming home in flag-draped caskets from Iraq, CIA director Leon Panetta (left) revealed a surprising – and to many, no doubt, confusing – fact. "There are 1,000 al-Qaeda that are still in Iraq," he said. "We saw the attack that was just made the other day. It too continues to be a fragile situation." That's right - 1,000 al-Qaeda in Iraq where the U.S. has fewer than 50,000 troops. In Afghanistan, where there are twice as many American troops, intelligence estimates put the number of al Qaeda at no more than 100, reports CBS News senior national security correspondent David Martin. – CBS
Dominant Social Theme: It's a long, hard road to victory.
Free-Market Analysis: Americans are war-weary but Leon Panetta (left) sees reasons to fight on. Al-Qaeda is still active and as long as al-Qaeda exists (see above article excerpt) America needs to fight. The struggle is taking place "Over There," so Americans do not have to fight al-Qaeda "Over Here." CIA Director Panetta made his remarks on Capitol Hill where he attended a hearing regarding his confirmation as Secretary of Defence.
But as we shall explore in this article, something else needs to be done because the apparently phony War on Terror is not providing the momentum for militarism that, say, Germany provided during World War II. As a dominant theme it is proving unconvincing for the moment. The West cannot count on the al-Qaeda threat as currently constituted to continue to justify the trillions that the wars are costing.
The West – or more specifically Western elites – needs al-Qaeda and the War on Terror. It is very convenient for Anglo-American power elites trying to consolidate world rule. Wherever there is resistance, there is al-Qaeda. Wherever there is al-Qaeda the West may strike. Wherever the West strikes, it tries to consolidate power and authority. The idea, apparently, is to use military force to consolidate One World Government.
Anglosphere elites have laid the groundwork for this all-encompassing government through various global entities such as the United Nations. But having created the architecture, these ambitious elites now have to ensure that their grand vision is populated. If people won't cooperate voluntarily, force is to be used.
Of course we disagree with the idea of One World Government, even though Western elites have evidently held onto this vision for centuries. From what we can tell, the great intergenerational banking families of the Anglo-American power elite have been working on the concept for 300 years or more. We think the initial concept emerged in Venice around the 10th or 11th century but was refined in Britain around the 15th or 16th century with the advent of central banking.
What central banking showed the elites of the day was that if one could consolidate power and set up a central bank, then one could control the country through Money Power. Thus the idea of world government gradually emerged. One by one, countries would be taken over, central banks installed and the paraphernalia of regulatory democracy funded and expanded.
The clearest modern evidence can be seen in Afghanistan. Yes, there is an operative central bank in Afghanistan, even though it is relatively dysfunctional. There is a central bank in Iraq as well. There is even a central bank in Somalia! The bank was reopened in 2009 by the recently formed Transitional Federal Government (TFG) as part of a drive to "restore national institutions."
Bear in mind that the TFG controls a few hundred acres of contested land on the coast of Somalia – if that. But nonetheless, the first order of business, while the bullets are flying, was to open a central bank. That's because the majority of central banks in the world, over 100, are coordinated out of the Swiss-based Bank for International Settlements. It's a form of world government that's being built quietly and methodically.
The Western mainstream media is filled with memes about civil society generally, and a major one of course is the relative superiority of the Western model of finance and literacy. But in Europe and America this can be seen nowadays as a questionable in our view, where up to 50 percent of certain portions of the population are out of work and dependent on shrinking government subsidies.
The Western model is NOT in fact capitalist; it is statist – a statist model that is actually failing. The capitalist society is in fact something of a false front for the elite's accumulation of power. This is why we have called what the Anglo-American elite accomplished in the 20th century a Dreamtime. Using central-banking surges of fiat money, the elites created whole phony industries – automobiles, airlines and of course technology.
These industries would have emerged anyway, but likely not with such speed and viciousness. Mass-production in our view is something of a fiat-money phenomenon. The great surges of paper money that central banks are capable of producing distort whole economies and give people a false idea of what business is like.
Having pried people off the land with the lure of "white collar" jobs that disappear when the business cycle turns, the Western elites have created a massive group of hundreds of millions who are dependent for portions of their lives on government institutions. Many people are merely one paycheck or one government program away from food insecurity.
The elites have also succeeded in disrupting the community support networks of charities and churches that might take care of people in times of need. The state has taken over these functions and does a poor job of it. Phony industries, degrading paper money, dysfunctional higher education and ephemeral professional jobs – all this is the result of 20th century civilization.
The idea is to make the mass of citizenry helpless and afraid; this helps with the imposition of world government; but contrast this to the failed states that the West is attacking in Somalia, Afghanistan and now, apparently, Yemen. These are primarily agrarian societies with clan and tribal cultures. Justice is familial and local (out of the hands of the state) and money if used (rather than barter) may have a component of gold and silver.
These cultures are successful in the sense that they are self-supporting and the lives of the people within them are not controlled by surges of paper money. It is easy to look down on such people as uncivilized and illiterate savages, but there are elements within these societies that have their roots in a valid past.
We can also see in successful modern countries like Switzerland some of the same facets. Land is held by individual farmers, power is held at the level of cantons and townships and there is yet a significant apprenticeship culture (many young men aspire to a trade rather than a degree).
The idea that elites have tried to inculcate throughout the West is that fiat money, a university education and a capitalist approach to problems constitute advanced civilization. But with the economic collapse of 2008, every part of this agenda has been called into question.
As Anglosphere elites see the credibility of their economic and cultural tools being questioned, they have returned, as before, to war. This is a repetitive phenomenon. Whenever the elites' program is challenged, the larger society suddenly begins to suffer from chaos and militarism.
The problems that the elites are facing today, however, are sizable. World war in our view is out of the question because of nuclear weapons. This is apparently why the elites have embarked on their phony War on Terror. Additionally, a regional war is surely possible, perhaps even a nuclear one between Israel and the Arab world. We covered that possibility here: Regional War or World War?
The problem facing the elites now is that the war on Afghanistan is not succeeding. An expansion of the war to Pakistan-proper is going to be met with resistance from both the Punjabis and domestic Western populations and further wars are problematic as well.
Iraq is beginning to seethe again. Afghanistan is slipping away; Libya is not going well; Somalia remains unresolved and now apparently the theatre of war has expanded to Yemen, where the CIA also claims to detect "al-Qaeda." One wonders how the Pentagon and NATO officials are going to handle the general war-weariness of the West as they continue to start new conflicts in order to fully pacify and dominate this area of the world.
If one looks at the theatre of the War on Terror, it now encompasses much of the Middle East and Upper Africa. With French interference into the Affairs of the Ivory Coast, that part of Africa has been destabilized as well. Another area of rising conflict is the Sudan, where the UN – an Anglo-American tool – managed to effectuate a division of the country, which itself leads to further conflict.
Increasingly, Western populations will not tolerate these wars – four of them, today, and perhaps 600 areas of conflict around the world. They are both unjustified and unjustifiable. For this reason, it seems to us that Western elites will either withdraw or escalate. While we would like to predict a de-escalation, give the Anglosphere elite's determination to move ahead with world-governance, we would not rule out some sort of false-flag event that can be used to leverage the regional war that the elites are evidently starting. We've written about one such scenario here: Upcoming US Nuclear Event?
How does Panetta feel about disengaging? "That decision really does rest with General Petraeus and Secretary Gates and the president," Panetta said at his hearing. Secretary of Defense Robert Gates seems is no hurry to leave either. During an interview with "60 Minutes" he said any Afghan withdrawals should not lower combat troops.
Conclusion: The West is weary of war and so is the American public (and Europe as well). And yet the number of wars that the elites apparently demand continues to escalate. There is an apparent contradiction here and as Ayn Rand famously pointed out, such reality-based contradictions cannot exist. Either these wars, with their intolerable expenses will subside, or they will escalate regardless. The question becomes, then, how will such disparate conflicts be further engaged. What will it take?
l 
|
You must be a site member to submit suggested edits or post feedback. In addition to submitting edit suggestions and posting feedback, your Free Membership to The Daily Bell gives you access to our Member Zone where you will discover a plethora of other member benefits. Want to learn more? click here |
|||||
|
|
||||
 |
Posted by Summer on 06/12/11 08:39 AM
"Organisms typically base their success primarily on deception and rely on actual force or mutually advantageous trade (symbiosis) as little as possible."
Oh dear, the 'we are animals and behave like them' and cannot expect anything different vibe. Then you have no right to demand an end to Elite enslavement, you must accept it as 'naturural.'
"This should be nearly self-evident, but is generally overlooked due to the moral codes we elitists foist on our subjects."
Moral codes obfuscate servitude or elaborate on it being wrong? I mean come on, you wouldn't even know it was 'wrong' unless you held it accountable to some moral standard, otherwise you should be happy with survival of the fittest and nothing else!
'Let me give a few examples in case the moral culture has to some extent impaired your powers of objective observation."
Meme alert! We are animals and WILL behave like them. Can animals write poetry, can animal decide between RIGHT AND WRONG actions? No, but we can that is the HUGE difference! The social contract is nothing new. Hobbes in Leviathan unleashed his monster, the life of man 'poor, nasty, brutish and short'. If that's all you can hope to expect from man, that is what you'll get! In fact the Elite media control you mention probably funded the book you quote.
'Visible rulers are highly vulnerable.' Freemasons and secret societies?
'Thus we see visible rulers claiming to be representatives of God, the common good, the material forces of history, the general will (either through vote or intuition), tradition, or other intellectual "spooks" that serve to lessen the envy of the ruled for the rulers. Encouraging such self-delusions among the masses of the ruled is universal for visible governments.'
It is not 'God' to blame, then is it? The rulers are manipulating peoples' beliefs for gain, does that sound like something that is done exclusively on the basis of supposed religion and morality?!
'By embracing deception wholeheartedly at every level, finance capitalism, or rule through money, has fashioned the ultimate system yet devised for the secure exercise of power.'
What is the cure to these ills? To acknowledge the disease only? Or look at the root cause- the IMMORALITY of the leaders; and say it is WRONG, for the sake of justice?
'Through power in the universities, publishing, and mass media rullers have been able to reward the sincere, professorial cranks whose spurious doctrines happen to rationalize in terms of "common good" the government supported institutions, laws, and economic measures upon which our money powers depend'
Are you kidding me? The biggest publishing manipulation is to divorce morality from every sphere of life and then say they are acting for some warped version of the 'common good' whilst subjecting all to totally immoral and vicious acts.
'Secondarily, the power of the lords of money rests on an occult knowledge in the area of politics and history. They have quite successfully corrupted these sciences.'
Absolutely true, that's why people have no idea about the golden periods of history where decency, honour and goodness created impressivly 'just' societies.
'...Through systematic infiltration of all major intellectual, political, and ideological organizations, using the lure of financial support and instant publicity, we have been able to set the limits of public debate within the ideological requirements of our money power.'
True, and they've done this by manipulating psyches - that structures or societal shifts without the requirement of the morality of justice can really take place, successfully generating a 'good/advanced' world.
As if!
|
Posted by Summer on 06/12/11 08:33 AM
"Organisms typically base their success primarily on deception and rely on actual force or mutually advantageous trade (symbiosis) as little as possible."
Oh dear, the 'we are animals and behave like them' and cannot expect anything different vibe. Then you have no right to demand an end to enslavement, you must accept it as 'nature.'
"This should be nearly self-evident, but is generally overlooked due to the moral codes we elitists foist on our subjects."
Moral codes obfuscate servitude or elaborate on it being wrong? I mean come on, you wouldn't even know it was 'wrong' unless you held it accountable morally otherwise you should be happy with survival of the fittest and nothing else!
'Let me give a few examples in case the moral culture has to some extent impaired your powers of objective observation."
Meme alert! We are animals and WILL behave like them. Can animals write poetry, can animal decide between RIGHT AND WRONG actions? No but we can that is the HUGE difference! The social contract is nothing new Hobbes in Leviathan unleashed his monster, the life of man 'poor, nasty, brutish and short'. If that's all you can hope to expect from man, that is what you'll get! In fact the Elite media control you mention probably funded the book you quote.
'Visible rulers are highly vulnerable.' Freemasons and secret societies?
'Thus we see visible rulers claiming to be representatives of God, the common good, the material forces of history, the general will (either through vote or intuition), tradition, or other intellectual "spooks" that serve to lessen the envy of the ruled for the rulers. Encouraging such self-delusions among the masses of the ruled is universal for visible governments.'
It is not 'God' to blame, then is it? The rulers are manipulating peoples' beliefs for gain, does that sound like something that is done exclusively on the basis of supposed religion and morality?!
'By embracing deception wholeheartedly at every level, finance capitalism, or rule through money, has fashioned the ultimate system yet devised for the secure exercise of power.'
What is the cure to these ills? To acknowledge the disease only? Or look at the root cause- the IMMORALITY of the leaders; and say it is WRONG, for the sake of justice?
'Through power in the universities, publishing, and mass media rullers have been able to reward the sincere, professorial cranks whose spurious doctrines happen to rationalize in terms of "common good" the government supported institutions, laws, and economic measures upon which our money powers depend'
Are you kidding me? The biggest publishing manipulation is to divorce morality from every sphere of life and then say they are acting for some warped version of 'common good' whilst subjecting us all to totally immoral acts.
'Secondarily, the power of the lords of money rests on an occult knowledge in the area of politics and history. They have quite successfully corrupted these sciences.'
Absolutely true, that's why people have no idea about the golden periods of history where decency, honour and goodness created impressivly 'just' societies.
'...Through systematic infiltration of all major intellectual, political, and ideological organizations, using the lure of financial support and instant publicity, we have been able to set the limits of public debate within the ideological requirements of our money power.'
True, and they've done this by manipulating psyches - that structures or societal shifts without the requirement of the morality of justice can really take place, successfully generating a 'good/advanced' world.
As if!
 |
Posted by Wayne on 06/12/11 02:05 AM
Very interesting! Another dead perpatrator, with no formal hearings/trials/proofs/whatever!
Click to view link
How convienent!
|
Posted by Wayne on 06/12/11 12:14 AM
"CIA Director Leon Panetta told the US Congress earlier this week that a large-scale cyber attack while would cripples power, finance, security and governmental systems was "a real possibility in today's world"." So is this the "false flag" already?"
He works for Who?
And they do What?
Is he lying?
Does a duck have feathers?
 |
Posted by KittyAntonikWakfer on 06/11/11 09:53 PM
Oops. Forgot to include link before sending off - Click to view link
|
Posted by KittyAntonikWakfer on 06/11/11 09:51 PM
"Another very interesting analysis by DB. I saw part of Panetta's hearing at capital hill for his confirmation as defense secretary.
"Interesting that he said this: "the next Pearl Harbor that we face could well be a cyber attack'. does that sound familiar?"
Being reported this evening "IMF hit by 'very major' cyber security attack" at BBC. Last paragraph:
"CIA Director Leon Panetta told the US Congress earlier this week that a large-scale cyber attack while would cripples power, finance, security and governmental systems was "a real possibility in today's world"." So is this the "false flag" already?
|
Posted by Wayne on 06/11/11 09:45 PM
opps typo explanation!
|
Posted by Wayne on 06/11/11 09:45 PM
Well, why do I suspect that Astrolatry is not unknown you?
And a great description/explation, without revealing too much!
 |
Posted by speedygonzales on 06/11/11 07:27 PM
"The world is governed by very different personages from what is imagined by those who are not behind the scenes." ~ Benjamin Disraeli (Earl of Beaconsfield)
Organisms typically base their success primarily on deception and rely on actual force or mutually advantageous trade (symbiosis) as little as possible. This should be nearly self-evident, but is generally overlooked due to the moral codes we elitists foist on our subjects. Let me give a few examples in case the moral culture has to some extent impaired your powers of objective observation. Camouflage is universal among predators and victims alike. Blossoms imitate fragrances and colors which are sexually attractive to certain insects in order to effect pollination. Dogs bark ferociously and feign attack on enemies of whom they are, in fact, terrified. The Venus Fly Trap plant lures flies to their deaths. Men proclaim their altruism to others and even themselves while they selfishly scramble for personal advantage. If you doubt that fraud is normal in nature you should read section 3 of the first chapter of Robert Ardrey's "The Social Contract" for a wealth of fascinating examples. (Of course Ardrey fails to grasp the full application to contemporary human society of his brilliant insights into man's animal nature.)
Visible rulers are highly vulnerable. Thus we see visible rulers claiming to be representatives of God, the common good, the material forces of history, the general will (either through vote or intuition), tradition, or other intellectual "spooks" that serve to lessen the envy of the ruled for the rulers. Encouraging such self-delusions among the masses of the ruled is universal for visible governments. However, such spooks are little protection for the leaders of such systems against their sophisticated elite rivals and no protection against men like your father. The Roman Empire was unquestioned by the mass of its subjects for centuries, but the Emperors lived in constant fear of coup and assassination.
By embracing deception wholeheartedly at every level, finance capitalism, or rule through money, has fashioned the ultimate system yet devised for the secure exercise of power.
Throughout history, secure ruling elites arise through secret, or occult knowledge which they carefully guard and withhold from outsiders The power of such elites or cults diminishes as their occult knowledge is transformed into "scientific" knowledge and vanishes as soon as it becomes "common sense." Before analyzing the secrets of the finance capitalist money cult let us glance for historical perspective at occult astronomy, the oldest source of stable rule known to man of which astrology is hut the pathetic remnant.
Through power in the universities, publishing, and mass media rullers have been able to reward the sincere, professorial cranks whose spurious doctrines happen to rationalize in terms of "common good" the government supported institutions, laws, and economic measures upon which our money powers depend. Keynesianism is the highest form of phony economics yet developed to our benefit.
Secondarily, the power of the lords of money rests on an occult knowledge in the area of politics and history. They have quite successfully corrupted these sciences. Although many people are familiar with our secrets through such books as 1984 by the disillusioned George Orwell, few take them seriously and usually dismiss such ideas as paranoia. Since real politics is motivated by individual self-interest, history is viewed most accurately as a struggle for power and wealth We do our best to obscure this self-evident truth by popularizing the theory that history is made by the impersonal struggles between ideas, political systems, ideologies, races, and classes. Through systematic infiltration of all major intellectual, political, and ideological organizations, using the lure of financial support and instant publicity, we have been able to set the limits of public debate within the ideological requirements of our money power.
|
Posted by Wayne on 06/11/11 06:58 PM
"Interesting and refreshingly introspective. There are periods of 'advancement' in most peoples, often becoming arrogant. After the advancement of the Islamic Empire the West finally emerged out of the dark ages to build upon the declining Islamic Empire, which had excelled in many areas and laid the foundations for progress (in science, maths, architecture, art, literature, jurisprudence and an equitable economic system).
Will we see history repeat itself, will the tables be turned again? "
"nihil novi sub sole" ("there is nothing new under the sun"), in Ecclesiastes 1:9.
The wheel always return to the beginning!
|
Posted by Summer on 06/11/11 06:49 PM
I can't stand the Saudi rulers they infuriate me. They are sell-outs, spineless and hypocritical religious hijackers; THEY DO NOT REPRESENT ISLAM, anymore than the US government represents Christianity! I wouldn't put anything past those Saudis, but if they do dare side with Israel, all hell will break loose amongst the Muslim populace and rightly so.
DB: What central banking showed the elites of the day was that if one could consolidate power and set up a central bank, then one could control the country through Money Power. Thus the idea of world government gradually emerged. One by one, countries would be taken over, central banks installed and the paraphernalia of regulatory democracy funded and expanded.
Money power possible via weapon of interest!
DB: The Western mainstream media is filled with memes about civil society generally, and a major one of course is the relative superiority of the Western model of finance and literacy
Interesting and refreshingly introspective. There are periods of 'advancement' in most peoples, often becoming arrogant. After the advancement of the Islamic Empire the West finally emerged out of the dark ages to build upon the declining Islamic Empire, which had excelled in many areas and laid the foundations for progress (in science, maths, architecture, art, literature, jurisprudence and an equitable economic system).
Will we see history repeat itself, will the tables be turned again?
|
Posted by Wayne on 06/11/11 05:20 PM
If only one could ever live up to this!
Then truly we would have become a Man!
Great Selection from Kipling!
Thx
 |
Posted by rossbcan on 06/11/11 09:25 AM
"Mildly" skeptical piece regarding the Bilderbergers...
Excerpt:
"You've got the world's most powerful people sneaking around like naughty kiddies."
...and only gets better:
Click to view link
It is the internet (and elite predatory costs that has motivated people to think and consider) that has exposed elite deeds / hands, dipping into OUR cookie jar. If they ever do a mea culpa and state "sorry", you can bet it means "sorry that they got caught"
They are doomed if the "rule of law" is ever re-established by the sane:
Click to view link
|
Posted by johnblenkins on 06/11/11 06:07 AM
Glad you mentioned Kipling. TO me this is the way to look at life and the world.
IF.....
IF you can keep your head when all about you
Are losing theirs and blaming it on you,
If you can trust yourself when all men doubt you,
But make allowance for their doubting too;
If you can wait and not be tired by waiting,
Or being lied about, don't deal in lies,
Or being hated, don't give way to hating,
And yet don't look too good, nor talk too wise:
If you can dream - and not make dreams your master;
If you can think - and not make thoughts your aim;
If you can meet with Triumph and Disaster
And treat those two impostors just the same;
If you can bear to hear the truth you've spoken
Twisted by knaves to make a trap for fools,
Or watch the things you gave your life to, broken,
And stoop and build 'em up with worn-out tools:
If you can make one heap of all your winnings
And risk it on one turn of pitch-and-toss,
And lose, and start again at your beginnings
And never breathe a word about your loss;
If you can force your heart and nerve and sinew
To serve your turn long after they are gone,
And so hold on when there is nothing in you
Except the Will which says to them: 'Hold on!'
If you can talk with crowds and keep your virtue,
' Or walk with Kings - nor lose the common touch,
if neither foes nor loving friends can hurt you,
If all men count with you, but none too much;
If you can fill the unforgiving minute
With sixty seconds' worth of distance run,
Yours is the Earth and everything that's in it,
And - which is more - you'll be a Man, my son!
|
Posted by Wayne on 06/11/11 04:06 AM
Rudyard Kipling wrote in his Epitaphs of the War:
'If any question why we died,
Tell them, because our fathers lied.'
|
Posted by Wayne on 06/10/11 11:33 PM
"Elites don't get out enough and are increasingly inbred"
This is soo funny!
Can you see these fools actually trying to build something?
That would be funnier than a Three Stooges movie.
|
Posted by johnblenkins on 06/10/11 09:10 PM
Thank you I did enjoy. I like the title "the land of make believe"
Why not, born as freemen?
 |
Posted by channa on 06/10/11 09:01 PM
Just want to include one more quote from the article I link to in previous comment:
'No system of missile defenses can be fully effective without placing sensors and weapons in space. Although this would appear to be creating a potential new theater of warfare, in fact space has been militarized for the better part of four decades. Weather, communications, navigation and reconnaissance satellites are increasingly essential elements in American military power. Indeed, U.S. armed forces are uniquely dependent upon space"
Isn't that spooky? They admit to militarized weather!
|
Posted by channa on 06/10/11 08:57 PM
Another very interesting analysis by DB. I saw part of Panetta's hearing at capital hill for his confirmation as defense secretary.
Interesting that he said this: "the next Pearl Harbor that we face could well be a cyber attack'. does that sound familiar?
The cyber attack talk has been increasing lately. Remember the PNAC crowd that wrote their report in 2000 and also talked about a "new pearl harbor".
Well, that report is very interesting when you get down to about page 50. That is where they make that infamous statement (top of page 51). But even more interesting was their report on Cyber Space and the internet.
I agree with Daily Bell about your analysis about the internet and the elite not quite considering this variable to their Globalist plans.
But, one thing not being talked about much, even on the internet sites that are digging for truth, is the added element of Cyber space dominance (included in full spectrum dominance).
In their report in September of 2000 this is just one sample of what they say:
'In short, the unequivocal supremacy in space enjoyed by the United States today will be increasingly at risk. As Colin Gray and John Sheldon have written, 'Space control is not an avoidable issue. It is not an optional extra.' For U.S. armed forces to continue to assert military preeminence, control of space - defined by Space Command as 'the ability to assure access to space, freedom of operations within the space medium, and an ability to deny others the use of space' - must be an essential element of our military strategy.
If America cannot maintain that control, its ability to conduct global military operations will be severely complicated, far more costly, and potentially fatally compromised. But, over the longer term, maintaining control of space will inevitably require the application of force both in space and from space, including but not limited to antimissile defenses and defensive systems capable of protecting U.S. and allied satellites; space control cannot be sustained in any other fashion, with conventional land, sea, or air force, or by electronic warfare. This eventuality is already recognized by official U.S. national space policy, which states that the 'Department of Defense shall maintain a capability to execute the mission areas of space support, force enhancement, space control and force application.'
I'm not an expert but this sure sounds like something that we might start hearing more about soon (especially if a Cyber Attack is their next kick off point to more wars and more authoritarian measures to the masses, both US/Europe).
You can read their report as well as the article at the following. The point where they start talking about the 'new pearl harbor' and the 3 missions that must be met before the 'US' (a.k.a. Globalists) succeed. One of those is the complete control of Space and Cyber space:
Click to view link
So, there could be a reason why we hear little about what they are up to in secret regarding the control of space and cyber space. Issues they won't talk about are important. Notice how the mainstream is not even reporting about the Bilderbergs, although their was a bomb threat.
c.hanna
|
Posted by Wayne on 06/10/11 08:47 PM
I despise no invididual.
My enemies are groups, that were individals who have allowed themselves to be coopted in the myth of the group/collective/whatever.
Personally, I'm a loner by preference, other than my former military unit, and a few associates.
I just found this as a gift to you in case you have never heard it
Hope you enjoy! And don't think this is a personal attack upon you. I'm not implying that this is you! Pax!
Click to view link
|
|
