News & Analysis
Conspiracy's Longer Timeline
9/11 And The Rise of The World Wolf State ... It is an amazing fact of history that what passes for history in the West is factually untrue. The people get public mythologies and government lies instead of the facts, so what they know is not real. Currently, the State is the principal actor and recorder of history. And what it records is not the truth, but what is politically convenient for the corrupt oligarchs and various special interests who have captured the State's myth-making powers. If we don't know the real history of financial crises, terrorist attacks, and wars then we can't claim to live in free societies. Today, the power to create and write history is in the dominion of the State. And the history it is writing is based on lies, deception, and propaganda. Since the end of World War II a slow and gradual political revolution has occurred in America, England, France, Canada, Australia, and other Western nations against the liberal democratic state. In its place has risen what William Ralph Inge called the "Wolf State" in his 1948 book, "The End of an Age." - The Excavator
Dominant Social Theme: The state is the answer to our problems and the cradle of our dreams of freedom.
Free-Market Analysis: This is an interesting article, once again, by the Excavator, a university student who runs a blog devoted to exposing the "truth" of the new world order. He has apparently discovered a book written by William Ralph Inge, a professor of divinity at Cambridge and Dean of St Paul's Cathedral, way back in the 1940s. Inge coined a name for the Nazi state – the "Wolf State."
According to Inge (in the Excavator's words), the Wolf State was the bedrock of Nazi Germany, but it "did not begin with Hitler and will unfortunately survive it ... The Wolf State outlasted the madness of Hitler and Nazism to be worshipped anew by another set of madmen elsewhere in the world. In post-WWII America, new devils arose under the cover of the CIA and the National Security State as part of an American Wolf State ...
"They exploited the American people's fear and ignorance in the Cold War climate for the political and financial gain of a powerful few. America's wolves were hungry and lethal. They worked up a big appetite in the 1950s after taking down a number of democratically elected governments, but that was not enough. The Big Get was America."
The Wolf State began in earnest in America, with the assassination of President John F. Kennedy which "turned the page on the short-lived American experiment in self-government." Kennedy had "wounded the ambitious and cunning wolf pack by firing CIA director Allen Dulles and refusing to commit American blood and treasure to a hopeless war in Vietnam." Thus a reason to murder him.
Inge was not a prophetic genius, we learn. "He was just able to see the writing on the wall by the end of World War II that political systems in the West were in a deep state of crisis. Although Nazism was defeated, the philosophy that gave birth to Nazism did not disappear from history." Here's some more from the article:
In the chapter, 'The Philosophy of the Wolf State,' Inge said that the institutions of a free society and a government are at war with an external enemy are naturally at odds with each other, writing: The question may be raised whether the repudiation of parliamentary government and of all the ideas which collectively constituted what Fisher calls the Liberal experiment is necessarily connected with aggressive imperialism and blatant immoralism ...
The answer seems to be that the theory of the State which we have to examine demands that a nation shall be permanently on a war footing, and that this type of State is almost incompatible with liberty and decent behaviour. We are discovering with regret that in order to combat Fascism we are obliged to a large extent to fascise ourselves. Power politics and liberty can hardly exist together.
In the beginning of the 21st century the eyes of the Western Wolf State turned inward. There was a hint of this dark reality during the Cold War period when secret intelligence agencies and covert military groups carried out terrorist attacks in European cities as part of Operation Gladio which were falsely blamed on leftist groups. But those activities were mild compared to the treason and state terror that occurred on September 11, 2001 and July 7, 2005.
The Wolf State had grown up and come alive on September 11. New imperialist wars were planned, and a whole new world government structure was being put in place behind the scenes. 9/11 was the cataclysmic event that made the people go along with new wars, state surveillance, and the militarization of society. II. The World Wolf State It is worth repeating again and again that America underwent a radical political revolution in the 20th century that was orchestrated from the very top, and which was instigated by foreign financial interests.
This revolution came into being "in the dark and as a result of moral corruption and political treachery at the highest levels of society and government in America." Additionally, the trigger was actually the establishment of the private Federal Reserve Bank in 1913 – which provided the conspiracy with a bloodsucking appendage even as mainstream media provides the anesthesia.
Since 1913, the article explains, the world has not been the same. America, once a bright and shining light on the hill, was turned into an "an evil empire and a country of unspeakable evil, capable of sacrificing its own people for the god of war, as it did on September 11, 2001."
Sadly, millions of men died in World War II to rid the West of fascism, and yet the forces of fascism that hijacked the West's secret intelligence agencies, have reimposed fascism, this time on the victors of World War II. "America and the West are now dying from the same disease that inflicted Germany in the 1930s and other countries in history: Blind State Worship."
This is a courageous, eloquent retelling using a notable source. But from the standpoint of directed history it does not, yet, go far enough. The modern one-world conspiracy, according to alternative reality-based historians may have gotten its start in the 1700s with the establishment of the Illuminati; its first notable victory may have been in France, during the French Revolution with public agents like Maximilien Robespierre.
The great banking families of Europe and their enablers were apparently behind the French Revolution. This was their answer to the laissez-faire movement in America. In fact, one could argue that the American Revolution, or at least the US Constitution that came out of it, were already influenced by Black Aristocracy of Europe. The Constitution for all its greatness is merely a generalized road map and actually reserves to the State fairly broad based powers. This was one reason a faction of the Founding Fathers insisted on writing a Bill of Rights to clarify the Constitution's intentions.
The French Revolution turned the American Revolution on its head. While thanks in part to the eloquence of Thomas Jefferson, the American Revolution was positioned as anti-state (certainly anti-British), the French Revolution looked TO the state for remedies. It was believed during the French inspired "Age of Reason" that humanity could build a better future via the application of science to state-craft.
This genocidal certainty actually found its echo in America's technocracy movement in the 1920s. It has manifested itself in the 21st century within the context of Peak Oil and Smart Meters. America was always a primary target for one-world elites because it was clearly evident that America was going to emerge as a primary world power.
The US was a profoundly agragrian, free-market culture – and the elites did the best they could to undermine it. They worked through their apparent agent Alexander Hamilton to influence the Constitution. Later on they backed Abraham Lincoln – or so it seems – through the great New York banks and seemingly helped plan and implement the American Civil War.
It was the Civil War, actually that was the turning point for American liberties. Once states could no longer secede, the whole paraphernalia of authoritarian rule could be brought to bear on the US. The 50-years after the Civil War saw a reshaping of America. It changed America from an agrarian, free-market society into a corrupt, urban one. It is no coincidence that America political corruption began in earnest after the Civil War.
The elites infiltrated such apparent European banking agents as JP Morgan into American finance. It is more than likely, according to conspiracy historians, that the panic of 1907 was caused or exacerbated by JP Morgan in order to set up an American-style central bank. This duly happened in 1913 along with the imposition of an income tax.
The "Excavator" is certainly correct that the establishment of an American central bank was a turning point in freedom-history. The Civil War ended the American republic. It could be said that the establishment of the Federal Reserve began America's history as Empire.
The advent of the Internet in the 20th and 21st centuries has provided the world, and especially America (where its impact is most felt), with a kind of Internet Reformation similar to the Protestant Reformation coming after the creation of the Gutenberg Press. It took the Gutenberg Press 100 years to have a major impact; the Internet has had a similar impact in 20 years.
The great fear-based promotions that the power elite has used to control society, the dominant social themes of scarcity used to create the receptacles of global governance, these are tumbling down now, or at least beginning to erode. Alternative media chat rooms and increasingly mainstream venues, are full of vituperation about the new world order. Sometimes it seems that it is all people talk about. The worse it gets, the more people speak out.
Unfortunately, the Internet has steadily revealed the creation of an abysmal, growing domestic tyranny in the US. "Net observers should see the Internet, like Karma, works both ways. Even as civil rights are undone, so the elite's mechanisms of manipulation are exposed. There is a reason that George Bush, Sr. once stated that the American people would be most unhappy to learn what the top political and financial elites had done in the 20th century. The revelations of directed history reveal an astonishing, absolute brutality.
These people (for it was not we or you) were content to drop atom bombs on the people of Japan, killing, inevitably, millions of women and children. The message was not only meant for Japan; it was a broadside aimed at the rest of the world, in particular Stalin. Messages had been sent before (the telegraph sent a famous message, too, on inception) but this one was constructed of a genocide.
It is certainly conceivable that Anglosphere elites were behind ALL the major wars of the 20th century and that the results of these conflicts were intended to be the infrastructure of global government via the UN, etc. But in the late 20th century and early 21st century it seems the elites have increasingly taken (once more) to attacking America itself.
We do not know the details of what happened on 9/11, but like many if not most Americans, we are suspicious and believe the government has lied. Even a majority of the 9/11 Commission now claim they were serially lied to by the powers that be. The events should be reinvestigated seeing that there are so many questions and contradictions surrounding it. What has come out of it has only been evil: torture, rendition and the phony war on terror.
But even leaving aside 9/11, what is astonishing is that so many violent, "newsworthy" acts that took place in America in the past two decades directly or indirectly implicate the American government. There was the horrible attack at Waco, and the events of Ruby Ridge. These were not merely singular, unconnected events.
The Columbine shootings, for instance, reveal clearly there were more individuals involved than the two dead teenagers. Some other school shootings raise the same suspicions. (Even the attempted assassination of Ronald Reagan has come under question given that his attacker had to shoot THROUGH a car door to hit Reagan, thus giving rise to the assumption that Reagan was wounded via ricochet.) Americans have not stopped the violence committed abroad in their name abroad; thus, the beast has turned now and has sunk its claws and fangs into the domestic body politic.
The FBI, it came out recently, is refusing to provide a regional court with video tapes for the Oklahoma City bombing, claiming they have been, perhaps, misfiled and cannot in any event be found. They also confiscated all the available video tapes in the Washington DC area after the 9/11 attack on the Pentagon. What is increasingly clear is that the FBI is acting as a gatekeeper for many of the most murderous – or at least controversial – events of the 20th and 21st centuries, obscuring their provenance at the very least. The FBI is evidently and obviously the government's "partner in crime" in this regard.
Today, US polity can be aptly described as laboring under a great weight of fear. It is the reason why so little gets done in Washington. It is not gridlock but terror that keeps legislators in line. This has been the case since J Edgar Hoover began collecting files on politicians in order to blackmail them; but the fear is far thicker now and thus more powerful. With its ability to wiretap almost at will, the FBI has a totalitarian weapon of intimidation and it is one that is useful in propping up the status quo of the military-industrial complex.
Conclusion: The history of the Modern Age is a powerful, authoritarian sweep. It began in its modern incarnation some 300 years ago – perhaps even longer. It is run by powerful banking families and their enablers and its goal is one world government. The concept of the Wolf State that the Truth Excavator exhumes is only a kind of excrescence of larger conspiracy rooted seemingly in ancient times. No political movement can really describe it; no state mechanism ignites it. It is, unfortunately, much deeper than that.
l 
|
You must be a site member to submit suggested edits or post feedback. In addition to submitting edit suggestions and posting feedback, your Free Membership to The Daily Bell gives you access to our Member Zone where you will discover a plethora of other member benefits. Want to learn more? click here |
|||||
|
|
||||
 |
Posted by tumbleweed on 07/16/11 08:26 AM
Yorkielass
For a different take on that early period in 'the controvery, check out
isbn141205600-4 does what it says on the cover, and thanks never heard of douglas reed before
|
Posted by donspry2 on 07/16/11 06:51 AM
This is left leaning diabtribe. Once again, John Kennedy is held up as the virtuous and iconic defender against the evils of the state. How ludicrous to say he was part of the solution against the "Wolf State". He was the culprit behind the build up of the Vietnam war by sending advisors there. His death relieves him of future responsibility and gives credence for those pundits into the "what ifs" and "only ifs" of an unfulfilled legacy. Dwight Eisenhower, a man of war, saw first hand and understood the reality of the dangers of the "Wolf State".
Reply from The Daily Bell
We are left leaning? Are you sure?
 |
Posted by Questor on 07/15/11 04:01 PM
Although I am grateful for the documentation of just what the gub'ment is doing, I see nothing new here.
From the beginning of time someone has always sought to enslave his neighbor, whether literally, or in our case, with debt-serfdom. Nothing has changed...we get only brief respites from the wolf state.
It began with the Serpent and Adam, and ends only when Yeshua returns. Even then, the populace will be upset about it, for even a righteous government will be ruling with an iron hand is a necessity with mankind, and some will not like even the best possible human world.
We need to see a heart change in man before we will see any other change on this planet. Until then, it is a gradual precession towards Armeggedon
|
Posted by Questor on 07/15/11 03:59 PM
Although I am grateful for the documentation of just what the gub'ment is doing, I see nothing new here.
From the beginning of time someone has always sought to enslave his neighbor, whether literally, or in our case, with debt-serfdom. Nothing has changed...we get only brief respites from the wolf state.
It began with the Serpent and Adam, and ends only when Yeshua returns. Even then, the populace will be upset about it, for even a righteous government will be ruling with an iron Click to view link's a necessity with mankind, and some will not like even the best possible human world.
We need to see a heart change in man before we will see any other change on this planet. Until then, it is a gradual precession towards Armeggedon.
|
Posted by memehunter on 07/15/11 03:44 PM
Yorkielass,
It's interesting to see you mentioning Douglas Reed. His "Controversy of Zion" was an eye-opener for me. I don't know if you have been a regular reader here at DB, but we recently had quite a few debates along those lines (some actually got a bit heated...) and I actually mentioned Reed as a "must-read", more than once.
 |
Posted by Siegfried on 07/15/11 02:33 PM
Thanks for the link, I'll check that out!
Rossbcan: "just insist they have internet access, as I did:)"
Yes, please!
 |
Posted by rossbcan on 07/15/11 10:17 AM
"Murdoch's Watergate?"
Would not be proceeding unless he somehow "offended the club". This may be worth DB shining the light of reason on...
|
Posted by speedygonzales on 07/15/11 10:06 AM
"The Wolf State outlasted the madness of Hitler and Nazism to be worshipped anew by another set of madmen elsewhere in the world."
Social theme: While we do not elimiante influence of key players it is making not difference to be obsessed with their puppet regimes which are created to serve key players interests by applyin': "No permanent friends. No permanent enemies. Permanent interests only."
The goal of This 2 much push antipathy toward nazis or commies is creating illusion that regime in which we live is better. It is not at all. Because they told us so many lies, how many of you even read program NSDAP? The main point is that even Hitler and nazi Germany were created by khazarian bankers to fight for them for their lost Khazaria, full of oil. Hitler was created by them to fight Stalin but Hitler turned against them by creating own money. It was so close and so infectious in their stronghold, Europe, that nazis must be destroyed as once Khatars were. It took them 10 years including Stalins involvement against whom Hitler supposed fight their Gog and Magog war.
Click to view link
Click to view link
Click to view link
When Hitler-nazi were done bankers planed attack Stalin's empire right away: Operation Unthinkable.
Click to view link
So when Stalin did job and help defeat from Web of debt escaped german nation bankers wanted continue their original agenda use Germany to fight Stalin.
Stalin even refused Marshall plan and Bretton-Woods agreements so they created NATO as alliance to destroy free world forewer.
As soon as khazars took control over western affairs they started their fight for The lost homeland:Khazaria which lies between Caspian and Black seas north of Georgia. In the peak of their empire they controled 1 milion sq kilometers. Piece a land.
First they took control over England. But they did not have enough infantry power to go to The continent, so they send their agent to became secretary of treasure of the French king. He took loans even with over 100% inetersts. So king went bancrupt and he refinanced his loans in Swiss. This is a sin! Ye can not show back to the khazars! So The french revolution come. After they established their freemasonic puppet on throne of France-Napoleon-they send him to fight for their empire against Russia.
During 19.centuries their tried to build up bigger military power by creating revolution in Habsburg and Ottoman empires. In the same time they supported their comrades in Pale setlement to making rebelions against rullers of Russia.
After creating Federal reserve they ignited WW1 and keep it alive by Belgium relief found until bolshevik revolution was done.
Click to view link
And so on with WW2. After Putin kicked off khazar oligarch who were making money on "their" oil main goal of NATO with USA on top is encircle and isolate Russia. This is why Iraq, Afghanista, Pakistan. And cut Russia's ties with anyone arround the world by creating revolutions and establishing puppet regimes. If it is not working, like Venezula, they try isolate that country by criminalizing due supporting terrorism.
Egypt refused loans from IMF and USA. If will continue this way, sooner or later is gonna be labeled as supporting terrorism.
The best way for prevent another war is dismantling European Union and creating Slavia, which is slavic union. Countries put into despair by bankers- PIIGS- should turn to cooperation with Russia as well.There would be great if Portugal will rent some port and military facilities to Russia and China for exchange for oil and goods.
Creating line South America-Asia-South and East Europe-North Africa will eliminate power of khazars.
"As important a figure Putin is for every freedom-loving Russian, he is just as important to those who love freedom in the United States of America, in Britain and all over the European world."
Click to view link
--------------------------------------------------------------
Murdoch's Watergate? The hacking scandal currently shaking Rupert Murdoch's empire will surprise only those who have willfully blinded themselves to that empire's pernicious influence on journalism in the English-speaking world.
Click to view link
Social theme2: Nazi and commie propagandists have been amateurs compare to FOX News. The same fox news has been obssesed with word nazi:
In their advertisement, the 400 rabbis single out Fox News host Glenn Beck and Fox News chief Roger Ailes for using Nazi and other Holocaust references in slamming adversaries.
The rabbis are demanding that Ailes apologize and that Fox owner Rupert Murdoch sanction Beck.
"In the charged political climate in the current civic debate, much is tolerated," the rabbis write in their advertisement, published in the Murdoch-owned Wall Street Journal and the Forward, a Jewish newspaper.
"But you diminish the memory and meaning of the Holocaust when you use it to discredit any organization or individual you disagree with."
Click to view link
"journalism in the English-speaking world"
Social theme3: There was not journalism in english- speaking world for 100 years, when all those Rockefellers, Carnegies, JP Morgans, Murdochs etc took over every single newspaper, TV station. "Competition is a sin!" Rockie.
Many time folx sayin': right, left,lib, cons,rep,dem News. News is not right, left,lib,cons. If news is like this, is already different category: Political comment. And it is hard to find news in english-speaking world on mainstream. Except weather and sport. News is like weather or sport. You go to 10 tv chanels and 10 newspapers and weather or sport are the same. But try somethin' about Chavez or Ghaddafi. They are marxists,nazi,socialist,dicators all but respected elected officials. If Ghaddafi would not be respected by 130 tribes, same as Saddam, he would not be in position.
People can not realize what internet did tho them. Internet ripped them off of trilions of dollars investments durring ages. Internet turned upside down bloodsweatin' build matrix.
|
Posted by John Danforth on 07/15/11 10:05 AM
"LEARN HOW TO THINK"
You can easily stop people from thinking, let alone learning how to think, by putting feeding them with handouts.
The whole trick is in keeping those who are to produce the loot willing to keep donating. And the way to do that is to convince them that putting others on welfare is the Right Thing, and that their rightful place in the world is to contribute their Fair Share.
The whole edifice rests upon the promotion of collectivist morality. Altruism. Without the unearned guilt of declaring one's self unfit to live because of the actions it takes to live, the whole thing crashes down. It's the one thing that all willing slaves throughout history have in common. A perversion of the reasons why benevolence, voluntarism, kindness, and peaceable cooperation are the proper way to live, the mind-worm is that you are good only if you exist to serve others, and evil if you make something of yourself. Expose this poisonous morality for what it is, and it will become impossible to enslave entire societies. Because you can't keep half of a population on welfare if the other half of the population won't feed them. And you can't rule the many by the few for very long if the many don't consent. And the many won't consent when they decide that the purpose of their lives is their own choice, that the reason society tries to instill deep feelings of inadequacy in them conceals the fact that the majority of them are desperately impotent themselves. The ugly fact is that they must destroy self-confidence at its root in order to survive the way they do. Evil is impotent. It is the desire for the unearned. When a man awakens and learns that he is not evil, does not owe his existence to everyone around him, and learns that his strength is supposed to feed their weakness, and that they must infect him with the same weakness in order to manipulate him, evil shrinks like the Wicked Witch of the West in a pool of water.
This is the ultimate tool of power. The sanction of the victim. We will evolve away from unearned guilt, or we will continue along the same path. As societies evolve to a higher standard of living, better weapons of destruction are invented in parallel. The ultimate weapon underlying them all is the defeat of the Real Man. The crux of that weapon is the destruction of his self esteem, murdered in the crib.
Thanks for keeping up the good fight, Bill.
|
Posted by rossbcan on 07/15/11 08:45 AM
"The dream of technocracy"
The average person (subverted education) is totally clueless regarding science and the scientific method (SIMPLE, failproof truthseeking methodologyy).
Clarke's (Aurthur C.) Third Law
"Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic."
So, elites / slavers falsely claim to represent scientific truth (much as corrupt priesthood class misrepresented the meaning of the bible to "we are master", or god will smite you, until the Guttenburg press allowed people to get the truth of the bible, first hand, destroying the church as dangerous hyprocrites) to mean "they are in control" "or else" we will use the laws of reality (which only we, the superintelligent mystics understand) to smite you by powerful forces beyond you comprehension.
It is up to us who KNOW (and can prove) better to disseminate first hand truth and counter the forces of mysticism and ignorance.
I KNOW U also KNOW this.
My primary weapon is "LEARN HOW TO THINK". Do that and, all else follows:
Click to view link
|
Posted by John Danforth on 07/15/11 08:06 AM
State Science has always been thus.
With regard to your four points;
The State will always fund research that promises to reinforce current dogma, research that doesn't support it is heretical by definition. (Darwin was heretical when first published.) So original work looking in the 'wrong' direction will get starved out in an environment where the state funds most research and vacuums up any and all economic surplus.
On keeping people ignorant of the true nature of reality, this seems to be as old as mankind. You don't have to know the true nature of reality in order to capitalize on peoples' fear of the unknown. The world is a dangerous place, it's impossible to know every danger and make the world into a hospital, but feeding on peoples' fears and reinforcing them while offering some assurance by pretending to be some kind of master of the universe seems to be the most surefire way of becoming a master of mankind. Which came first, church or state?
Your fourth point, aiming at the idea of a technocratic state, is most interesting to ponder. This may simply be a reflection of the increasing difficulty of hornswaggling people about the nature of reality with various scare stories about malevolent supernatural entities.
In fact, new dominant social themes are constantly being cooked up on technical claims, one after the other, and I suppose we shouldn't be too surprised at their success. People love a good doomsday scare and can be depended not to work up a sweat learning the basic rules of nature that would allow them to give the story a good smell test.
The same basic technique is applied as in the old days, but with a new mystery that is beyond mere mortal apprehension -- the mystery of science. Many, many State Scientists dream of a technocracy with themselves appointed as saintly overseers. But this is a pipe dream all its own. There are two fatal risks associated with this dream. The first is that they love to ignore the fact that they already eat off the productivity of real working people whose output is stolen from them at the point of a gun, and whenever technocrats succeed in getting a civil government overthrown, they are always the first to be summarily executed by the gunmen they employed to do the job.
The second big risk is that the more outlandish the claims they make to stampede the herd, the more likely it is that their entire edifice will crumble at the first revelation of contrary facts. In this respect the older orders had a superior strategy -- at least they knew enough to start off with a meme that by definition could never be tested in reality, never be disproven, could never be defeated by a mere discovery. Also, the technocrats make the fatal error of pretending to be agnostic about morality, whereas the older orders wrapped their stories up in, and claimed to be the source of morality, making for an entirely more stable meme.
Typically humans seem to enjoy being ruled by either charlatans or thugs. Or, more accurately, every so often the people decide they'd rather be ruled by thugs that charlatans, and vice versa. Any state must employ a healthy number of thugs in order to extract a free living off the people, who without that threat would simply ignore them and go about the business of living.
The State Scientists dream of winning out over the other charlatans and ruling with benevolence. Their dream ignores reality, they are blinded to a simple fact, what should probably be considered the fifth point: their employment by the current set of charlatans serves one overriding goal above any other -- to provide the state with new improved tools for use in perpetuating the power of the state. This means: tools with which to control or destroy people. A secondary purpose for their employment is as public relations foils, so people will be happy the State is working to turn the world into a big hospital with free meals and diaper-changing service for their easy enjoyment (the better to make the next shocking threat a Big Surprise).
The dream of technocracy may be the biggest single delusion enjoyed by this class of tax parasites.
|
Posted by Yorkielass on 07/15/11 07:14 AM
Douglas Reed- A little background history should you never heard of this author.
Douglas was Top war correspondant with the Times of London for years leading upto WW2 he was stationed in Europe an eye witness so to speak.
He became aware that his reports back to the Times were being altered some never published at all.
Returning to London he found that certain politicians had come under the sway of Zionism.
The Times of London too had been taken over by Zionist'.
Douglas resigned his position at once.
His works
Click to view link
Douglas Reeds "The Controversy of Zion" now on the internet!
Commensing in 1951, as Britains foremost World War II correspondent, he spent more than three years writing "The Controversy of Zion" - all 300.000 words of it. He completed the epilogue in 1956. Although there is correspondence to show that the book was once discussed with his publisher, the manuscript was never submitted, but remained for 22 years gathering dust in his home in Durban, South Africa.
Would he have loved the internet! Now, half a century later, it exists, and must assist in the dissemination of his powerful truth. Several chapters show how much he would have loved this possibility. Just as much as the zionist censors of the internet hate this breach in their worldwide brainwashing and control of the media.
In Europe during the years immediately before and after World War II, the name of Douglas Reed was on everyone's lips. His books were being sold by the tens of thousands. He was known with intimate familiarity throughout the English-speaking world by a vast army of fans. And then he was banished. Was it this book? Take a look at these chapters and judge for yourself.....
Click to view link
His books from the past inform us of the future!
Black-listed Classic a review!
This review is from: Controversy of Zion (Hardcover)
It's not at all surprising that this urbane and encyclopedic decimation of Jewish power and pretense has been (for the most part successfully) marked for murder by the American publishing industry. Were Doug Reed's "Controversy" to find its way into the hands of too many thinking people, there would be at least a glimmer of hope for a restoration of Anglo-Saxon power both here and abroad. Let's be blunt: Click to view link's "review guidelines" probably contain some empurpled fine print, courtesy of their friendly local ADL, to the effect: "Never praise Douglas Reed." So I don't expect this to see print. But in the odd event that one of their proofers was dozing over her "New Republic" and flavored Starbucks as this one flew by (is sarcasm permitted?), let's devote a few words of praise to a much-maligned and underappreciated book. Reed's main subject? The anthropological origins, political and economic goals, and real-life tactics of the Ashkenazi and Zionist "Jews" from the Old Testament era to the mid-1950s. His basic thesis: that this "certain people's" bloodline runs not to the Holy Land of OT times but to the 10th century Khazar empire, and that they've merely applied the redoubtable Khazar warrior acumen to the 20th century's marketplace and political arena to get what they want. Very touchy subjects, these, some of which are currently rising Phoenix-like in the Jewish establishment as "new" controversies, i.e., the (Jewish-produced) documentary on their possible Khazar origins that PBS plans to cautiously float this year. Not to mention the century-old internecine struggle for internal control between the Eastern and Western Jews, the Zionists and assimilationists, the secular and religious "Jews" (those darn quotation marks again). I think we will find, after much bloody debate and maybe more palpable events inside and out of the Jewish people and their state, that Reed was eerily prophetic and mostl! y right about Zionist motives, Jewish identity, and the consequences on the world stage as the true nature of both is slowly revealed. Reed's writing style is much like (his contemporary) Waugh's: elegant, acidic, detached. But as a foreign correspondent for the London Sunday "Times" during WWII and its spawning of the "Jewish" state, he was anything but a detached observer of these tectonic events. The truly open-minded will at least read and attempt to refute Reed rather than smear him. Few books this provocative are as thoroughly-documented or as intelligent as "Controversy", and the powers-that-be know it. This book remains in print, but will become progressively harder to find as the ADL and the New York publishers continue to tighten the censorship screws. This is not a book for the tame or weak-minded. Is it for you?
Click to view link
Insanity Fair excellent read too.
It's very sad that this man was driven away from his homeland for writing Books!
|
Posted by rossbcan on 07/15/11 06:37 AM
"conspiracy only means to breath together"
We live in a division of labor (goal seeking) civilization. It is ludicrist to believe thae criminals would not also use the most powerful goal seeking methodology (division of labur) available. The only reason it is called conspiracy is to have a false, ill defined concept that organized criminals (states, et al) can deny exists and keep us wasting our time atguing this false point, while the reality of organized (conspiring) criminals, false falg events, etc is IN OUR FACE, undeniable.
Truth is, achieving goals using force / fraud (criminal) is the most economically efficient (max gain / minimal investment) way of prospering, in the short term, far more efficient than actually working and producing something. Problem is, that criminals prospering subverts entire civilizations to the criminal (easy buck, smash and grab) mindset, disincets the productive and creates defensive conflict, the inevitable reaction of victims.
The end result (of "crime does pay") is that civilization (the rules by which we peacefully trade for MUTUAL self-interest) collapses to war (predation writ large) and all productive activity ceases.
It is this inevitable outcome that the "rule of law" once protected us from, before it was rationalized away, by predatrs on the bench:
Click to view link
|
Posted by vivek on 07/15/11 02:45 AM
Frank, first off, conspiracy only means to breath together (etymological root). Con-Spire.
And as a good idea generator who has been as loggerheads with the establishment, let me tell you that in this current world, between regulatory capture, vested interests and a general kleptocratic mindset, only the current direction is allowed to blossom.
Click to view link
And what a direction it's been eh? Better world? Hardly.
By the way, another quick etymological detour: Progress, that which we all yearn for, is pro-gress, merely moving in the dominant direction. The words have it.
Click to view link
Good ideas do not always win out over the bad, Prescott Bush did help finance the 3rd Reich (we are in the 4th now), operation paperclip was a reality, South America is full of rich German/Euro descendants immediately post WWII).....
Click to view link
C'mon. Red pill time!
Reply from The Daily Bell
All true.
|
Posted by memehunter on 07/15/11 01:47 AM
I should probably also add to my list (this is also an important point):
4) Provide justification for, and swaying popular opinion in favor of the establishment of a technocratic state
|
Posted by memehunter on 07/15/11 01:30 AM
Thanks for the link.
Siegfried, I believe you would enjoy reading The Ascendancy of the Scientific Dictatorship: An Examination of Epistemic Autocracy, From the 19th to the 21st Century" by Paul and Phillip Collins.
Click to view link
Admittedly, there are some repetitions in the text and the book would have benefited from being revised by a professional copy editor (it was self-published). But, aside from these relatively minor issues, I think that it is well worth reading.
If we admit the possibility of "directed history", then we have to contemplate the possibility of a "directed history of science". In the last few years, I have become increasingly dissatisfied and even suspicious of many fundamental tenets of modern science (even though I am trained as a scientist), beginning with Darwinism (which you also mentioned), medical science (specifically vaccines and the whole pharmaco-centered Western allotropic medicine), and most of modern physics since Einstein. There are many links proposing alternative theories regarding these topics (or simply "debunking" the mainstream theories), and some of them are impressively rigorous.
What the Collins are doing in their book (and I admittedly got interested in that book because I was already quite suspicious about Darwinism in particular) is to bring together the idea of a history directed by a conspiracy of Western elites with the idea of modern science (mostly state-sponsored, by the way) as a sophisticated ideological system designed to convey elites' memes to the public in the form of nearly-impregnable dogmas that can only be discussed by state-accredited experts, with the aim of slowly transforming a society's worldview and mold it in specific ways that are meant:
1) to favor viewpoints, concepts, and paradigms that are more favorable to, or in line with, the elites' plans
2) to block, discredit or discourage independent attempts to find out about the true nature of reality
3) last but not least, to keep people mostly ignorant of the true nature of reality, while providing them with a deceptive (and seductive) appearance of a deep and all-encompassing knowledge
|
Posted by Bluebird on 07/15/11 01:25 AM
That is interesting. I was not aware there was a carbon capture plant that was to enhance oil recovery. As per peak oil, I haven't a clue. I believe it is produced by decaying material, and it is possible we use it faster than it reproduces. However, there was such a large quantity before we began using it that it would not "run out" before more was made. I think it stays well ahead of us, in other words. But that is just my thoughts.
The West Virginia project was for "clean coal" technology. The idea was for the electric power plant (which services 11 states, I found) to capture the emissions from burning coal and pump it 1&1/2 mile underground through a pipe into pourous rock formations which would act like a sponge to hold the CO2. They claim as long as pressure through the pipe is maintained, the CO2 would stay in the pores. The start up cost was $70 mil. The next phase was going to cost $668 mil, half of which would have come from the US Energy Dept.
It is my opinion that it is throwing money down the hole. I do not believe in AGWarming. Both West Virginia senators have now made statements desiring this to go forward and will try to get the money somehow. I hope it dies the death it deserves. It was suppose to provide jobs, like all green projects are promising, or it would not go anywhere. Heaven forbid they provide technology (with jobs) for things we actually need.
|
Posted by memehunter on 07/15/11 12:37 AM
far from commercially viable, not "visible" - sorry!
|
Posted by memehunter on 07/15/11 12:36 AM
Thanks Bluebird. I thought that the idea of carbon capture plant was to reduce carbon emissions,so it is interesting to know that there are projects aiming to capture carbon underground. I need to read more about that.
Anyway, my view is that the whole idea of carbon capture plants is simply an expensive boondoggle designed to support the current elite myths about anthropogenic global warming (specifically caused by carbon dioxide emissions), and possibly also the "Peak Oil" myth (if it is indeed a myth, I am still somewhat undecided about that one).
Here is an excerpt from an article published on OilVoice:
ExxonMobil Expands World's Largest Carbon Capture Plant in Wyoming
Click to view link
"The $86 million expansion includes the installation of compressors to capture 50 percent more carbon dioxide for potential use in enhanced oil recovery and other industrial uses. Enhanced oil recovery involves the injection of carbon dioxide into reservoirs to produce additional oil and gas."
More background info from Wikipedia:
1. Enhanced oil recovery
Click to view link
This clearly explains that enhanced oil recovery is not about "producing additional oil and gas" - this is imprecise at best and a lie in the worst case - but simply to optimize the amount of oil recovered from a field.
2. Carbon capture and storage
Click to view link
Even Wikipedia admits that the idea is far from commercially visible (which means it would probably be abandoned without state support):
"Although the processes involved in CCS have been demonstrated in other industrial applications, no commercial scale projects which integrate these processes exist; the costs therefore are somewhat uncertain. Some recent credible estimates indicate that a carbon price of US$60 per US-ton is required to make capture and storage competitive,[85] corresponding to an increase in electricity prices of about US 6c per kWh (based on typical coal fired power plant emissions of 2.13 pounds CO2 per kWh). This would double the typical US industrial electricity price (now at around 6c per kWh) and increase the typical retail residential electricity price by about 50% (assuming 100% of power is from coal, which may not necessarily be the case, as this varies from state to state). Similar (approximate) price increases would likely be expected in coal dependent countries such as Australia, because the capture technology and chemistry, as well as the transport and injection costs from such power plants would not, in an overall sense, vary significantly from country to country."
|
Posted by Bluebird on 07/14/11 06:58 PM
I just realized I said Gov. Rockefeller instead of Senator. (He used to be Gov.) Yes, he is THOSE Rockefellers, and also one who wishes the internet had never been born. :-) I wanted to add that the carbon capture plant was to capture carbon underground. I don't know if there are other ways, but that was the plan. I have many things going on here at once, and I realize I am posting like a ninny, so I will sign off. I just wanted to be more clear.
|
|
