Appenzell
Switzerland
A Daily Compendium
of Free-Market Thinking
The Daily Bell Newswire - It's FREE!    


Islamofascism

"Islamofascism" currently is the most prominent use of a time-tested semantic device -- compounding two words into one. The effect on the reader or listener is to dim the distinction between the two original words and to associate the meaning of one of the original words with the other. "Niggerjazz," for example, was invented by Nazi propaganda technicians to transfer a racial slur to a musical form that was officially unwelcome.

The function of the term "Islamofacism" is to transfer the negatives associated with fascism onto Islam and to obscure the differences between Islam and fascism. The term's political purpose is to rule out the possibility of accommodation, compromise or reconciliation between the U.S. (and the Western world generally) and Islamic regimes and militant Islamic groups. It is an incitement to war by innuendo. "Islamofascism" serves that purpose by invoking the uncompromising attitude of the United States ("unconditional surrender") against the fascist regimes of Italy and Germany during World War II as the proper attitude for dealing with Islamic regimes.

Islam and fascism are distinct concepts. Islam is a religion. Fascism, in the abstract, is an economic system that preserves the formalities of private property but subjects nominally private property to control by the state.

In Italy, Mussolini developed fascism as a repackaging of socialism (he had been the editor of a socialist newspaper). Fascist concepts allowed him to expand the state's control and his personal power while disclaiming the goal of extinguishing property rights. Because it involved control over private property, fascism empowered Mussolini to reward friends and injure opponents.

In Germany, Hitler adopted fascism as a convenient political device. It allowed him to make a rhetorical distinction between Nazism and Communism and, as in Italy, it empowered him to reward friends and punish enemies. But unlike in Italy is was less an end than a means. The end was to promote the neo-paganism of worshiping one's tribe (the "Master Race").

Fascism acknowledges itself to be a human construction. Islam, on the other hand, sees itself as a revealed religion that points to a source of power and authority outside of anything constructed by mankind. It is "theocratic" in that it looks to Allah as the source of legitimate state authority, and it is illiberal in that it finds no inherent limits on state authority. But the necessity of state control of private property is not part of its teachings.

From a free-market point of view, there is nothing remarkable about Islam. Although it prohibits the charging of interest, it is not unfriendly to markets generally or to private property. Islam does not provide a basis for libertarian principles. Unlike fascism, however, it is not hostile toward free markets, it is indifferent.

"Islamofascism" bears the fingerprints of the monetary elite. The related "war on terror" inspires fear in the public and provides a rationale for limitations on personal freedom, regulation of international capital flows, military spending, political interference in smaller countries and deference to authority.

The Daily Bell Newswire - It's FREE!    


[Most Recent Quotes from www.kitco.com]

News & Analysis
09/02/10 Bank Run 2011?
09/02/10 Mises Shakes the World?
09/01/10 DC Begins the Bust Up
09/01/10 Thorium Cures the Free Market
08/31/10 Boetkke Promotion Redux
08/31/10 Obama Admin Calls US Education Failure
Guest Editorials
09/01/10 Tempted by One Size Fits All, by Dr. Tibor Machan
08/31/10 Iraq - An End or an Escalation? by Dr. Ron Paul
08/31/10 Frank Rich's Prejudice, by Dr. Tibor Machan

Subscribe to the
Daily Bell Newswire

It's FREE!
Timely email notification of...
  • Breaking News
  • Feature Interviews
  • Guest Editorials
  • White Papers
  • eBooks & Shorts
  • Special FREE offers
...and much much more!
Exclusive Interviews
08/29/10 Steve Forbes on Overseas Wars, the Coming Gold Standard and the Rise of 'Citizen Agitation'
08/22/10 Nelson Hultberg on Libertarian-Conservatism and His New Conservative American Political Party
08/15/10 Larry Pratt on the GOA, the Constitution and Gun Control
© Copyright 2008 - 2010 Appenzeller Business Press AG (ARBP). All Rights Reserved. The Daily Bell is an informative compendium of independent economic views and analysis, which is published by ARBP. The information contained in the Daily Bell is for informational purposes only, is impersonal and not tailored to the investment needs of any particular person and should not be construed as financial or investment advice. ARBP does not accept any liability or responsibility for, nor does it verify the accurateness of the information being provided in the Daily Bell. Daily Bell articles and interviews may include the contributions of several Daily Bell editors and may require factual editing after their initial post. Readers of the Daily Bell or any affiliated or linked sources or sites must accept the responsibility for performing their own due diligence before acting on any of the information provided within the report regardless of the source. In addition to proprietary, internally generated content, the Daily Bell publishes guest editorials from a selection of free-market thinkers, which may have been reprinted elsewhere and are not necessarily representative of ARBP's editorial views. Copyright is attributed to the author of any guest editorials featured at the Daily Bell, unless noted otherwise. ARBP often uses images licensed from Getty Images on the Daily Bell website.