Appenzell
Switzerland
A Daily Compendium
of Free-Market Thinking
The Daily Bell Newswire - It's FREE!    


News & Analysis

When Do the Lawsuits Begin?

Wednesday, February 17, 2010 – by  Staff Report


Al Gore

The academic at the centre of the ‘Climategate' affair, whose raw data is crucial to the theory of climate change, has admitted that he has trouble ‘keeping track' of the information. Colleagues say that the reason Professor Phil Jones has refused Freedom of Information requests is that he may have actually lost the relevant papers. Professor Jones told the BBC yesterday there was truth in the observations of colleagues that he lacked organizational skills, that his office was swamped with piles of paper and that his record keeping is ‘not as good as it should be'. The data is crucial to the famous ‘hockey stick graph' used by climate change advocates to support the theory. Professor Jones also conceded the possibility that the world was warmer in medieval times than now – suggesting global warming may not be a man-made phenomenon. – Daily Mail

Dominant Social Theme: Inaccuracies are anomalous?

Free-Market Analysis: The drumbeat for financial damages seems to have stepped up its pace as regards the failure of evidence surrounding global warming. It is not something that for the most part has been contemplated in the past – the idea that power elite and its allies could be subject to litigation over their phony dominant social themes. Since we are not especially litigious here at the Bell (as supporters of centuries-old common law), we are shy about mentioning this (though not too shy). Given how litigious society is generally, we've always found it a bit surprising that the idea of suing over the more egregious lies of the elite hasn't found more traction. Here's a feedback that can be seen in the Daily Mail, regarding the above article, cleaned up a bit:

Al Gore (pictured above) and these shyster scientists should have to pay back the trillions of dollars they've cost the world to WASTE on this tax hoax! Then they should be flogged in public as an example. The leaked emails PROVE that this disgusting man as his cohorts PURPOSELY destroyed the careers and livelihood of those GOOD scientists that based their studies on facts not LIES. They should be stripped of the livelihood, their grants, and their university positions given to the so-called skeptics who are in fact the ones with ethics. Al Gore should be forced to publicly retract the utter nonsense presented in his propagandist flick and if he were a man of integrity (which he is not – just look how he's stuffed his bank account as a result of his LIES). He should return his farcical Noble prize and apologize for all the needless economic suffering and personal angst amongst nitwit liberals he's caused!

Our perspective is that there is a good deal more potential litigation awaiting the ambitious lawyer who wants to sort through the detritus of failing and failed dominant social themes. There is plenty of evidence for manipulation of all sorts throughout the West including gold and silver markets, defense spending, health issues (vaccines), all sorts of environmental scare tactics, on and on. Here's some information on financial manipulations as related to us by Bill Murphy of GATA during an interview with the Bell:

Bill Murphy: The Gold Anti-Trust Action Committee's basic assertion for the past 10+ years is that there is a Gold Cartel out there suppressing the gold price. It consists of the US Government, including the Fed and Treasury, various other central banks, and bullion banks like Goldman Sachs and JP Morgan Chase. Bullion banks such as Goldman and Morgan became The Gold Cartel's hit men, trading the gold market from the short side and bombing the market in coordinated anti-trust fashion at the beck and call of our government, making a great deal of money in the process. It seems to have all started with Robert Rubin:

Before he was CEO of Goldman Sachs and then US Treasury Secretary, Robert Rubin worked as the top dog in London for Goldman Sachs. One of his duties was to oversee their gold trading operations. We know this because the CEO of Kirkland Lake Gold, Brian Hinchcliffe, whose firm is a staunch GATA supporter, worked in London back then for Goldman Sachs and reported directly to Robert Rubin.

This was many years ago (late 80's) and interest rates in the US were very high, say from 8 to 12%. Rubin had Goldman Sachs borrow gold from the central banks to fund their basic operations, doing so at about a 1 % interest rate. Then they sold the physical gold in the marketplace, using the proceeds as they so desired. This was like FREE money, as long as the price of gold did not rise to any sustained degree for any length of time.

Soon other major financial institutions realized what Goldman Sachs was doing and copied them. Rubin continued these operations as the overall Goldman Sachs CEO in New York and then took it to a new level as US Treasury Secretary. That is how the gold price suppression became the lynchpin of his widely acclaimed "Strong Dollar Policy." GATA's Reg Howe caught onto this notion by finding a paper titled, "Gibson's Paradox and The Gold Standard," co-authored by Lawrence Summers in 1988. Summers, a professor at Harvard at the time, succeeded Rubin as US Treasury Secretary. The bottom line of Summer's analysis is that "gold prices in a free market should move inversely to real interest rates." Control gold and it will help to control interest rates.

From GATA's standpoint it is a serious bummer that Summers is now the Director of the White House's National Economic Council for President Obama. Our energetic new President has the architect of America's economic demise as his key advisor.

I met with Bart Chilton, an outstanding and receptive commissioner with the CFTC, on December 19, 2008 and laid out GATA's evidence of the gold market manipulation. There were three others at our meeting from the CFTC, including their senior counsel. Bart took copious notes ...

Daily Bell: What motivates those who do this in your estimation?

Bill Murphy: The motives of "the cabal" are to give support to the dollar, keep US interest rates lower than they should be, and to tone down the widely watched US barometer of US financial market health, that being the gold price. After all, whenever the price of gold soars, it congers up talk of too much inflation, a sinking dollar, or a crisis of some sort ... all negative for Wall Street and the incumbent administration. That's exactly the sort of commentary you will be reading about in the weeks and months ahead as the price of gold soars.

Bill Murphy is fairly articulate about these manipulations and we have no doubt that he is correct about at least some of it. We believe this to be true because Wall Street is evidently and obviously a mercantilist institution – as are all great financial centers these days. There is, unfortunately, great interaction between private enterprise and government in the 21st century, and the elite has gone out of its way to ensure that these interactions are in a sense justified. In fact, such interactions are virtually mandated by legislation which has set up a plethora of overseeing bodies both in the EU and in the United States (and of course China, too).

Yet legislation, as the powers-that-be well know, in these large marketplaces is always subject to regulatory capture. That is, the most powerful players eventually gain sway over the regulators themselves, usually by hiring ambitious regulators and making the regulatory authorities beholden to them through a "gaming" of the political process. The game is only for those with the deepest pockets however, and in the process smaller players get squeezed out. This is why large entities in a regulatory democracy seek more regulation – which then concentrates power and removes competition.

What seems to escape the understanding of many is that not much in a regulatory democracy is offered for the betterment of the "people" or their lives. Instead, almost all legislation passed provides some advantage to some deep-pocketed private entity somewhere. This is why government ought to be restrained to the bare minimum (if it cannot be done away with entirely). The problem, as we have explained in the past, is MERCANTILISM, the deliberate conflating of private self-interest with the so-called public interest for personal and corporate gain. It is much easier to pass a law mandating a private-market profit (if one is wealthy enough) than it is to obtain an edge through competition.

The examples are seemingly limitless. When the autism/vaccine controversy was at its height some years ago, Big Pharma sought and received various federal protections against lawsuits. When the economy was collapsing in 2008, the American Treasury Secretary bailed out most of the biggest banking players through a US$700 million TARP program. When GM and Chrysler were on the way out recently, they applied to the US government for help and both companies received generous subsidies.

All of these private/public programs and more are mercantile by nature and therefore, by definition, dishonest. In fact, there is almost no corporate business these days that goes on that does not partake of some sort of government advantage – and is therefore not manipulated at the expense of an individual or groups. Who is going to compensate gold and silver holders, for instance, for the deliberate price suppressions over the years. And who is going to compensate those who have lost their homes because of government/private market bailouts of the current, corrupt Western central banking economy.

Conclusion: Our point is that while government likes to trumpet the supposed market failures embodied by Enron and Madoff, the largest manipulations take place within government itself at the behest of PRIVATE PLAYERS. To say it is legalized larceny (amounting literally to trillions) is to put too fine a point on it. Much of it is immoral and even criminal on its face, only it is never investigated and never comes to light. However, as the Internet increasingly brings mercantile double-dealing to light we wonder if the public will eventually realize how badly it has been duped, and how costly the damage is. The debate over damages would be a most interesting one to observe and probably mount into the tens, if not the hundreds, of trillions.

To see the full Bill Murphy interview with the Bell, click here.

Post Feedback

We look forward to reading your feedback. All comments are automatically posted. However, please note that any posts containing harassment, vulgarity, personal attacks or those which are deemed to be of a violent nature are not welcomed and will either not appear or be removed.






View Feedback

Posted by Sammy on 2/17/2010 4:18:12 AM

Thanks for the Murphy link - a good one.

Posted by Bill Ross on 2/17/2010 9:41:16 AM

"When Do the Lawsuits Begin?"

Never, or a pointless, doomed to fail endeavor, if attempted. The law is a hierarchical power construct. Corruption at the top (architectural control point) is sufficient to corrupt and negate the efforts of whatever honest judges reside at lower hierarchical levels.

Honest judges will defer to power out of TERROR of the consequences of not doing so, especially without KNOWING that the people (consent of the governed - MANDATORY) are willing to risk life and limb in supporting the law. It is another elite meme that the law can never function properly in its basic role as "reality accountant", assigning consequences to those who choose the actions.The problem is that we have "rule of corrupt, parochial man" as opposed to "rule of law" with objective, reality based standards (immune to opinion) regarding what is just and what is not.Rule of Law, Defined:

Click to View Link Defined:

We are all free to profit or suffer and learn (adapt to excellence) by facing the consequences of our OWN choices. Injustice is to be forced to suffer the consequences of choices of unaccountable (irresponsible) others..

"The danger is not that a particular class is unfit to govern. Every class is unfit to govern. The law of liberty tends to abolish the reign of race over race, of faith over faith, of class over class." ~ Lord Acton

The law has devolved to whatever "we, the people" are willing to tolerate. Tolerance is no longer consent, it is TERROR of defiance.


Reply from the Daily Bell:

It was just a rhetorical question, Bill. A literary artifice, a kind of scaffold on which an argument could be erected and some points made. Geez ...

Posted by Georgia Hamblin on 2/17/2010 9:45:54 AM

Thomas Jefferson said in 1802, "I believe that banking institutions are more dangerous to our liberties than standing armies. If the American people ever allow private banks to control the issue of their currency, first by inflation, then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up around the banks will deprive the people of all property until their children wake-up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered..." Amazing wisdom of this great man!

Posted by TeresaE on 2/17/2010 10:16:57 AM

Love this article and the truth it holds.

Wish I could speak of the truth with my circle without being labeled a "conspiracy theorist" or pessimist.I've asked the believers in GW to explain to me how the glaciers that covered America, especially cutting up my home state, melted? I ask them if they realize the effect the mini-ice age had on our world, and the outcome of millions of deaths from the plague.

A plague which just happened to directly follow mass starvation from shortened growing seasons.In the words of my grandpa, "I smelled a big commie rat." As for lawsuits, well now. These would be the first lawsuits I could actually believe in and support (in spirit). Fat chance of that.

Posted by David E on 2/17/2010 10:58:36 AM

We need to understand that "science" that we remember with the inventor coming up with a plan or academic freedom no longer exist. Science in the private sector is usually funded or purchased by big corporations, and in the public sector controlled by grants.

So if true academics want to stand up against the status quo, the powers simply "redirect" grants or give them to competing voices not unlike a presidential election. Once enough of the big names are on board, it is then easy to shift public favor away from the minority voice and discredit them.

Since climate data that we know of it a snapshot in time, it is easy to come up with results that match that snapshot in time, regardless if longer cycles are missed.

I cannot argue that alternative technologies are a good way to protect our interests, however artificially redirecting them is economically costly. The real issue is for the powers to monetize emissions and consumption of energy which is highly abundant. That can lead to controls from the country level down to individuals, much more insidious than a hybrid car.

Posted by Bill Ross on 2/17/2010 11:52:45 AM

"It was just a rhetorical question...Geez

"You KNOW it and I KNOW it.

Point is: If you want to be free, it is pointless to whine to (and pay) those who profit by remaining in strategic denial of the FACT that our freedom is inherent because we live in an action precedes consequence reality.

We are free to choose to do whatever the laws of physics allows. The only choice of others, arbitrary power included is: What do they choose to do in response.

Bottom line: Want freedom?, then, personally, don't put up with any crap. Nobody except LIARS claim life is risk free or without costs. Choose to be neither predator nor prey then, they cannot touch you without discrediting themselves.

Posted by Scott on 2/17/2010 11:57:28 AM

"The motives of "the cabal" are to give support to the dollar, keep US interest rates lower than they should be, and to tone down the widely watched US barometer of US financial market health, that being the gold price."

I guess this is the part that continues to elude me, and makes for difficult cocktail party conversation. One might assume that any group referred to as "the cabal" would be made up of persons of wealth by some traditional measure, chief amongst those being cash, gold and silver.

How do those people benefit from depressing the cash value of gold while at the same time depressing interest rates on cash? I would think that the motive of a person seeking to increase their personal power and wealth would work to increase both quantities?

I'd personally appreciate a more detailed explanation of this strategy.


Reply from the Daily Bell:

The cabal, power elite, whatever you want to call it, is after power rather than money. Money springs from power. Thus it is necessary to control society as best you can. And fiat money offers a lot more control than gold or silver ( to the degree you can issue it, anyway) which anyone can dig out of the ground. Hope that helps.

Posted by Bruce on 2/17/2010 8:40:24 PM

Government can do no wrong! Anything else is organized crime.

Government is no more than people claiming and asserting their rights. That is lawful activity. It is accomplished through due process of law. Anyone engaged in that activity is acting under law, and is exercising the power of government.

Anyone creating a situation which benefits one group at the detriment of another group is not government. What we are experiencing in Washington DC, and in every township, city and state is organized crime operating under color of law.

The actions of Congress and the Federal Administration for the most part are criminal. As long as we refer to these criminal acts being committed by government we suppress the impulse and the duty do do something about it.

If we are to live in a lawful society, we cannot tolerate criminal activity by public office holders in the name of government. Yet, if we rely upon public servants who have a delegation of authority to investigate and prosecute crime we will get no relief. They are part of the problem. That's why the Grand Jury and Petite Jury system was created. Anyone can call a grand jury and investigate crime. Anyone can be commissioned by a grand jury to execute a warrant.

Will the participants risk being persecuted by public servants for phony crimes? You bet! How many of you fought in any one of the various wars that the power elite contrived in order to consolidate their own power? How many of you believed you were risking your life for your country? It was a rigged game, though, wasn't it? But, you went. You risked life and limb. Nothing worthwhile comes without risk.

You don't need to play by the rules of the power elite. Learn how to investigate crime, issue a true bill, make affidavits of facts, commission special prosecutors and issue warrants. Make the criminals play by the rules of the common law. You won't have common law unless you exercise it.

Don't react to the fraud we call civil law government. Make the criminals in office react to your lawful process. Give them the rope to hang themselves -- give them the opportunity to make admissions and confessions of their crimes. Draw conclusions and create presumptions that will be confessed to by their silence. Make them join issue with you or stand mute and suffer judgment. Then use nonjudicial judgments to strip them of their wealth.

Enforce whatever judgments a lawfully constructed jury deems fitting and just. Bill Ross is absolutely correct. You cannot expect others, much less paid political hacks, to construct a lawful society. Their nature is to destroy it. You must create the conditions under which you desire to live. By your ignorance, silence, and inaction you are creating the conditions that you are willing tolerate.


Reply from the Daily Bell:

Eloquent. We expect a further missive from Mr. Ross.

Posted by Shawn on 2/17/2010 11:36:11 PM

We agree that the money that he made off of this scheme needs to be paid back. I think it is wonderful that the Bell is so clear on this promotion by the Socialist movement perpetrated by the power elite in order to transfer wealth from hard working people to the undiscipled world. Keep up the good work Daily Bell.


Reply from the Daily Bell:

Thanks.

Posted by Gordon Sceptic on 2/18/2010 12:38:46 AM

I recently read that "fat al" goldman and J P Morgan had formed a consortium which had exclusive carbon trading rights on the Chicago and London exchanges. Enough said?

Posted by William on 2/19/2010 1:17:09 PM

Outstanding article! The question remains, what can be done about it? How do we prevent our representatives from being bought by interested parties? I recommend impeachment suits for deserving representatives.

Posted by F. Swemson on 2/19/2010 10:25:44 PM

Like most who see through the AGW hoax, you're still missing the biggest part of the "Big Lie", and it's been in front of OUR noses since the beginning.

Do about 10 minutes of research on the Medieval Warm Period and the Little Ice Age, and then tell me which climate was more hospitable to life...That's right... :-)

WARMING IS GOOD!

See: Click to View Link


Reply from the Daily Bell:

Good point. But that doesn't render the hoax less costly.

Posted by F. Swemson on 2/20/2010 12:01:58 AM

Thanks for your reply, but you appear to have missed my point.I wasn't trying to paint it as being a minor issue. I believe that it's the biggest scientific hoax in history, and the intention of its perpetrators was to pull off the greatest robbery of all times.For several years now, "skeptics" like Dr. Lindzen, Lord Monckton, and others, have been speaking out against the hoax, and yet as brilliant and as passionate as they've been, they've failed to convince the public that the whole thing is a big lie.

The recent IPCC scandals haven't even made that big of an impact on the scam, because the lamestream media is basically ignoring the entire story, and few of our legislators who know the truth, have the stones to stand up and say so. The point of my previous comment is that reason why I believe that nobody has dealt with the issue properly is because they've been ignoring the most simple and basic scientific truths about the issue when they address it.As an example, rather than arguing whether the benefits of "Cap

Posted by F. Swemson on 2/20/2010 7:20:05 PM

Part 3

If we really want to defeat this evil hoax, we need to approach it in the proper way. We must keep repeating the basic science over and over again, and we must expose the people who are really behind it, starting with Maurice Strong, and the UN's environmental organizations. The UN has become prime culprit here. They operate under the assumption that their treaties supersede our Constitution.

As described on 'Soldier for Liberty

Click to View Link

the UN has devised a plan where upon they take from the rich (you and I and anyone else in the world that works for a living) and give to the poor (those countries who refuse to elevate themselves due to corrupt governments, societal concerns, etc..)

Just like 'Oil for Food however, the real plan is just to steal our money and institute a mafia like system to bully us into cooperation.

Posted by F. Swemson on 2/20/2010 7:21:08 PM

Part 4

It's all been laid out in great detail in the UN's 'Agenda 21, the progressives plan to "Save the Earth" ratified by over 100 nations at the UN's original Earth Day Summit in Rio De Janeiro in 1972. The full text can be found at the following

URL:Click to View Link

It should scare the hell out of every rational person on earth.

Everyone should also become familiar with one of the most evil men in the Obama administration, John Holdren, Obama's Science Czar:

Click to View Link

When you learn what makes these people tick, you begin to see that the AGW movement is literally the foundation of their sociopathic plan to control the entire world, by creating a singe world government with themselves in charge.

We need to work together and to work smart if we're to have any chance of defeating these people. We must not forget that there are literally TRILLIONS of dollars on the line here. They won't give up without a fight !

Post Feedback

We look forward to reading your feedback. All comments are automatically posted. However, please note that any posts containing harassment, vulgarity, personal attacks or those which are deemed to be of a violent nature are not welcomed and will either not appear or be removed.








[Most Recent Quotes from www.kitco.com]

News & Analysis
07/29/10 UK Stagflation - Now It Begins
07/29/10 Inflation - India's Turn
07/28/10 Is It a Deflationary Depression?
07/28/10 Comes a Blond Stranger ...
07/27/10 The Spreading Chinese Inflation
07/27/10 The War Falls Apart?
Guest Editorials
07/29/10 Protecting Your IRA - Part 2: Getting Your IRA Out of Town, by Terry Coxon
07/29/10 Gold Basis Screwed, by Dr. Antal Fekete
07/28/10 A Lopsided Warning, by Dr. Tibor Machan

Subscribe to the
Daily Bell Newswire

It's FREE!
Timely email notification of...
  • Breaking News
  • Feature Interviews
  • Guest Editorials
  • White Papers
  • eBooks & Shorts
  • Special FREE offers
...and much much more!
Exclusive Interviews
07/25/10 Grant Havers on Libertarianism, Religion and the Role of the Church in a Free Society
07/18/10 Paul Craig Roberts on Glass-Steagall, Free Trade and the Dangers of an Evolving 'Oligarchy of Private Interests'
07/11/10 Harry Schultz on the Power Elite, Free Markets, the Internet and Why Gold Is Going Much Higher
© Copyright 2008 - 2010 Appenzeller Business Press AG (ARBP). All Rights Reserved. The Daily Bell is an informative compendium of independent economic views and analysis, which is published by ARBP. The information contained in the Daily Bell is for informational purposes only, is impersonal and not tailored to the investment needs of any particular person and should not be construed as financial or investment advice. ARBP does not accept any liability or responsibility for, nor does it verify the accurateness of the information being provided in the Daily Bell. Daily Bell articles and interviews may include the contributions of several Daily Bell editors and may require factual editing after their initial post. Readers of the Daily Bell or any affiliated or linked sources or sites must accept the responsibility for performing their own due diligence before acting on any of the information provided within the report regardless of the source. In addition to proprietary, internally generated content, the Daily Bell publishes guest editorials from a selection of free-market thinkers, which may have been reprinted elsewhere and are not necessarily representative of ARBP's editorial views. Copyright is attributed to the author of any guest editorials featured at the Daily Bell, unless noted otherwise. ARBP often uses images licensed from Getty Images on the Swiss Confidential website. To unsubscribe from the Daily Bell, click here.