News & Analysis
Toll of War Deformities Is Heavy Price to Pay in Iraq
Iraq records huge rise in birth defects. New study links increase with military action by Western forces ... It played unwilling host to one of the bloodiest battles of the Iraq war. Fallujah's homes and businesses were left shattered; hundreds of Iraqi civilians were killed. Its residents changed the name of their "City of Mosques" to "the polluted city" after the United States launched two massive military campaigns eight years ago. Now, one month before the World Health Organisation reveals its view on the legacy of the two battles for the town, a new study reports a "staggering rise" in birth defects among Iraqi children conceived in the aftermath of the war. High rates of miscarriage, toxic levels of lead and mercury contamination and spiralling numbers of birth defects ranging from congenital heart defects to brain dysfunctions and malformed limbs have been recorded. Even more disturbingly, they appear to be occurring at an increasing rate in children born in Fallujah, about 40 miles west of Baghdad. – UK Independent
Dominant Social Theme: We did what we had to do but no harm was done.
Free-Market Analysis: People in the West would be shocked to know that their taxes had funded the wholesale poisoning of parts of the Middle East and Afghanistan but increasingly, that's how it seems.
We've written about it before numerous times. The culprit is depleted uranium and the powers-that-be have been "studying" for years and years the possibility that the radioactive dust from NATO and US weapons is a deadly poison.
What is depleted uranium? Here is a brief summary of Wikipedia information, posted at Yahoo Answers:
Depleted uranium (DU) is uranium primarily composed of isotope uranium (u-238) natural uranium is about 99.27% u-238, 0.72% U-235, and 0.0055% U-234. U-235 is used for fission in nuclear reactors and nuclear weapons. Uranium is enriched in U-235 by separating the isotopes by mass. The byproduct of enrichment, called depleted uranium or DU, contains less than one third as much U-235 and U-234 as natural uranium. The external radiation dose from DU is about 60% of that from the same mass of natural uranium. DU is also found in reprocessed spent nuclear reactor fuel, but that kind can be distinguished from DU produced as a byproduct of uranium enrichment by the presence of U-236.[3] In the past, DU has been called Q-metal, depletalloy, and D-38.
DU is useful because of its very high density of 19.1 g/cm3 (68.4% denser than lead). Civilian uses include counterweights in aircraft, radiation shielding in medical radiation therapy and industrial radiography equipment, and containers used to transport radioactive materials. Military uses include defensive armor plating and armor-piercing projectiles.
The use of DU in munitions is controversial because of questions about potential long-term health effects. Normal functioning of the kidney, brain, liver, heart, and numerous other systems can be affected by uranium exposure, because uranium is a toxic metal. It is weakly radioactive and remains so because of its long physical half-life (4.468 billion years for uranium-238). The biological half-life (the average time it takes for the human body to eliminate half the amount in the body) for uranium is about 15 days. The aerosol produced during impact and combustion of depleted uranium munitions can potentially contaminate wide areas around the impact sites leading to possible inhalation by human beings. During a three week period of conflict in 2003 in Iraq, 1,000 to 2,000 tonnes of DU munitions were used.
The actual acute and chronic toxicity of DU is also a point of medical controversy. Multiple studies using cultured cells and laboratory rodents suggest the possibility of leukemogenic, genetic, reproductive, and neurological effects from chronic exposure. A 2005 epidemiology review concluded: "In aggregate the human epidemiological evidence is consistent with increased risk of birth defects in offspring of persons exposed to DU." The World Health Organization, the directing and coordinating authority for health within the United Nations which is responsible for setting health research norms and standards, providing technical support to countries and monitoring and assessing health trends, states that no risk of reproductive, developmental, or carcinogenic effects have been reported in humans due to DU exposure. This report has been criticized by Dr. Keith Baverstock for not including possible long term effects of DU on human body.
Interestingly, the article in the UK Independent doesn't get around to mentioning depleted uranium until the very end. The article focuses mostly on mercury and lead as prime causes of birth defects – though eventually we learn that both metals are indeed related to weaponry.
The findings, published in the Environmental Contamination and Toxicology bulletin, led to a World Health Organization inquiry – and that's what precipitated the current coverage. The WHO's report deals with nine "high-risk" areas in Iraq, Fallujah and Basra among them. Here's more from the article:
The latest study found that in Fallujah, more than half of all babies surveyed were born with a birth defect between 2007 and 2010. Before the siege, this figure was more like one in 10. Prior to the turn of the millennium, fewer than 2 per cent of babies were born with a defect. More than 45 per cent of all pregnancies surveyed ended in miscarriage in the two years after 2004, up from only 10 per cent before the bombing. Between 2007 and 2010, one in six of all pregnancies ended in miscarriage.
The new research, which looked at the health histories of 56 families in Fallujah, also examined births in Basra, in southern Iraq, attacked by British forces in 2003. Researchers found more than 20 babies out of 1,000 were born with defects in Al Basrah Maternity Hospital in 2003, a number that is 17 times higher than recorded a decade previously. In the past seven years, the number of malformed babies born increased by more than 60 per cent; 37 out of every 1,000 are now born with defects.
The report's authors link the rising number of babies born with birth defects in the two cities to increased exposure to metals released by bombs and bullets used over the past two decades. Scientists who studied hair samples of the population in Fallujah found that levels of lead were five times higher in the hair of children with birth defects than in other children; mercury levels were six times higher. Children with defects in Basra had three times more lead in their teeth than children living in non-impacted areas.
Dr Savabieasfahani said that for the first time, there is a "footprint of metal in the population" and that there is "compelling evidence linking the staggering increases in Iraqi birth defects to neuro-toxic metal contamination following the repeated bombardments of Iraqi cities". She called the "epidemic" a "public health crisis".
We've been reporting this for years not because of any special insight but because there have been hundreds if not thousands of mainstream reports on the toxicity of depleted uranium. You can see one of our articles here:
Condoleezza Rice's Authoritarian Fantasy and Her CBS Enablers
It is disturbing and saddening – sickening, really – that the WHO after all this time is finally providing a report on the subject. No doubt that will lead to another study and another report, etc. (Excuse our cynicism.)
Meanwhile, women in parts of Iraq are told not to have babies because the chances of birth defects are so high. All across these regions is spread a fine haze of radioactivity with a half-life in the thousands of years.
US and NATO troops are not immune. They are apparently being poisoned by their own weaponry, though one can make case that vaccines like the anthrax jab are also to blame for the many debilitating syndromes being reported among troops.
The US Army pursued business-as-usual. According to the article, a US Defense Department spokesperson commented: "We are not aware of any official reports indicating an increase in birth defects in Al Basrah or Fallujah that may be related to exposure to the metals contained in munitions used by the US or coalition partners ...
"We always take very seriously public health concerns about any population now living in a combat theatre. Unexploded ordnance, including improvised explosive devises, are a recognised hazard."
Conclusion: For the Defense Department, the danger comes from unexploded ordnance. Unfortunately, the real danger seems to be radioactive dust and the blind denials from the US (and presumably NATO) are either normal commerce or something more damning. How about a war crime?
|
You must be a site member to submit suggested edits or post feedback. In addition to submitting edit suggestions and posting feedback, your Free Membership to The Daily Bell gives you access to our Member Zone where you will discover a plethora of other member benefits. Want to learn more? click here |
|||||
|
|
||||


![]() |
Posted by Summer on 10/17/12 06:56 PM
Disgusting.
This is proof that these wars have malicious intent, not just neo-colonialism. Extinction and disability is the aim.
As you sow so shall you reap...
Capitol hill address and warning. See at 3.30: Click to view link
Click to view link
Posted by SoCal fellow on 10/17/12 11:13 AM
Quite possibly, it is not just depleted uranium (from anti-tank and anti-aircraft rounds) that is causing the birth defects.
The birth defects may be being caused by enriched uranium, used in a new, low-radioactive signature neutron bomb:
Click to view link
Posted by MetaCynic on 10/17/12 10:10 AM
Americans are kept in a perpetual state of fear that some terrorist organization will someday deploy a dirty bomb on American soil. Well, a terrorist organization, the U.S. military, has been using dirty weapons, depleted uranium, for decades in the Balkans and in the Middle East.
It's no coincidence that the spike in infant mortality, birth defects and incidences of cancer coincide with the use of DU in war zones. Even children born to American troops who operated in areas saturated with DU dust are suffering from abnormally high levels of birth defects. Yet the various government agencies charged with protecting our health stubbornly adhere to the party line that DU is harmless.
Why aren't liberals even a tiny bit outraged over the behavior of their saint, tree hugger Al Gore? He has become obscenely wealthy milking the manufactured hysteria over CO2, a product of life. Yet, as a member of the Clinton administration, he remained silent over the use of DU munitions in the bombing of Serbia. The environment there and in the Middle East has been contaminated with DU dust.
Winds are picking up that dust. Eventually the entire globe will be enveloped with the American gift which will go on giving for almost all eternity. Are the Power Elite so crazed by money and power that they don't care that they and their families will also be living in a toxic environment?
Posted by Danny B on 10/16/12 08:05 PM
Don't attribute to planning what should be attributed to stupidity. Israel has long dreamed of a "greater israel". So, why did they pollute part of "israel" with DU?
Click to view link
Next, there is the demolition of Iraqi munitions when the army had no idea what type they were. Nerve gas, poison gas, bio-weapons,,,they just blew it all up.
Click to view link
Gulf syndrome for GIs,,, too bad. DU for GIs, who cares,,, in the brass.
In the main, the PTB don't give a rat's ass how much radioactivity is spread around.
How much do you think we have here in America?
"40. Number of high level radioactive waste tanks in Washington, Idaho and South Carolina: 239"
"41. Volume in cubic meters of radioactive waste resulting from weapons activities: 104,000,000"
"50. Estimated 1998 spending on all U.S. nuclear weapons and weapons-related programs: $35,100,000,000"
Follow the money.
Click to view link
Reply from The Daily Bell
"Don't attribute to planning what should be attributed to stupidity."
You mean the military really believes DU is not deadly? Don't believe it.
Posted by Bluebird on 10/16/12 05:23 PM
I came back to this article to check the ratings-looking good. After I first read it, I had to go cry. Thank you for this, Daily Bell! People so need to hear this. I am so discouraged trying to convince others that we are not heroes for these wars. I am to the point now that I feel that everyone who votes for the warmongers should be put on the front lines. Wonder if they will think it is all necessary then? It is heartbreaking.
Great feedback, Wrusssr! I will have to come back to read Abu's links later this evening. Thank you all!
Reply from The Daily Bell
Don't cry.
![]() |
Posted by Abu Aardvark on 10/16/12 04:29 PM
piolenc on 10/16/12 03:07 PM: "I have a feeling that Americans will be blamed for everything bad that happens in Iraq for the next century"
---------------------------------
I have a feeling that you may want to take a look at this:
"The Doctor, the Depleted Uranium and the Dying Children" - 6 Parts:
Click to view link
Click to view link
Click to view link
Click to view link
Click to view link
Click to view link
Reply from The Daily Bell
Thanks for the links.
Posted by Wrusssr on 10/16/12 03:28 PM
Multi-year and soon to be decades-old Middle East wars have cost America lives and treasure and good will for. . . what? Oil fields we don't need? To irradiate and sterilize and scramble populations' chromosomes and genes? To satiate a bunch of London-headquartered financial criminals' glutenous appetites for more war profits and nations' resources for pennies on the dollar? To weaken and make malleable humanity for global control?
What is the thinking behind insanity that sets loose a U-238 (depleted uranium) with a billion year life span to circle the globe on the great Middle East dust storms and winds? Was it to replace Arab central banks with ones owned by the London bankers? Like in Iraq and Libya and, well, everywhere an 'Arab spring' occurred/is occurring? You know, debt-free 'Arab Spring' countries that had/have their own central banks and gold and currency like Libya?
Was the selling of oil for gold, or in currencies other than the dollar, by these 'Arab spring' countries cause for alarm for the London bankers? Were the London money changers afraid these countries might spawn financially independent, self-reliant governments/nations they could not control with the monopoly money their 150 worldwide central banks print and sell to countries, including America? Was Saddam and 9/11 and the deliberate economic tarpit we're in preplanned to soften humanity up for their global financial coupe and the installation of an unelected world government and bureaucracy with themselves in charge of earth's resources and all the weapons and money in a bankrupt world?
Stay tuned for previews to our next exciting segment of Chaotic World. . . Sponsored by those wonderful folk who brought you decades of continuous war, cheap money, exciting false flag events, and a vaccine for any occasion.
We'll be right back.
Depleted Uranium and the Medical Mismanagement of Gulf War ...
Click to view link
THE INTERNET: Where Global Goblins, Great Deceptions, and Out-Right Lies Go to Die
ppjg.me/... /the-internet-where-global-goblins-great-deceptions-and-o...
Posted by piolenc on 10/16/12 03:07 PM
Lots of problems with this. One is the obvious one that U-235 is a fissile material, and succeeds in that role precisely because its spontaneous decay rate - its radioactivity - is very low. The second is that the article talks about mercury and other toxic substances - how can depleted uranium be blamed for those? What weapons in the US or British arsenals contain mercury, arsenic, etc.? I have a feeling that Americans will be blamed for everything bad that happens in Iraq for the next century, just as some Russians are still blaming World War 2 for what is wrong with their country.
Reply from The Daily Bell
From the article ...
"Dr Savabieasfahani said that for the first time, there is a "footprint of metal in the population" and that there is "compelling evidence linking the staggering increases in Iraqi birth defects to neuro-toxic metal contamination following the repeated bombardments of Iraqi cities". She called the 'epidemic' a 'public health crisis'."



l 













