"Then its paid and craven enablers 'write' the historical narrative."

Getting one's historical narrative pitch accepted as authentically authoritative may prove somewhat difficult in this era of fractured mass media.

Reply from The Daily Bell

True.

But how many of us get thrown into the FEMA camps first? And the staffing is supposed to be ready in February. Are they just going to round up protestors, or will they go after those of us who have been vocal on the net?

Reply from The Daily Bell

Dear Jeanna, you seem to be anticipating an urgency that does not exist yet ... The intention to "round up" people may far exceed the capacity or its realistic application ...

Well you know what they say... .when someone accuses you of being evil, you'd best not disappoint. It does seem as though no good contingencies have been planned for when the power elite move things into the next phase of operations, however. Disappointing...

Yeah, I've been getting these urges for a while to get of Dodge. They are becoming near to impossible to ignore when our "honorable" legislators feel justified in voting for the NDAA.

@Jeanna

Any FEMA roundup promises to be as effective as the ongoing overseas terrorist roundup where the powers-that-be deployed the very latest in military might.

Reply from The Daily Bell

Afghanistan? Pakistan? Yemen? Somalia? ...

By pure cooincidence, I was watching an old documentary last month about China and it included the Tiananmen Square incident] I was struck by the odd similarity with the progress of the OWS protests to what we know of the Chinese protests.

I just thought it was my overactive imagination, but couldn't shake off the feeling that that was a controlled "history" also. I remember some Youtube videos that claim to debunk the "tank man" situation. (anomolies, etc.) So after reading your article I did a search and came up with this: (Mainstream media, even)

Click to view link

It would be sad to think that the Chinese "massacre" weren't one after all--it's such an inspiring story. But could OWS be a kind of set up for an exaggerated "false flag" event that doesn't really happen? After all, these days it matters less "what happened" than what we're made to believe "happened".

Reply from The Daily Bell

When it comes to the "modern day" and what we call directed history, more and more we come down on the side of "anything's possible."

Hammond says UK not seeking 'perfect Afghanistan' (BBC News - ?4 hours ago?)

NATO fuel tankers torched in Pakistan attack (CBS News - ?3 minutes ago?)
Yemen: Al-Qaeda-Linked Militants Attack Army, 10 Killed (Huffington Post - ?1 hour ago)

Somalia fighting: New clashes in capital Mogadishu (BBC News - ?7 hours ago?)

Enough of pessimism!

'The Three Stooges' Trailer: Larry David and Snooki Get Eye Gouged (Video)
Click to view link

Reply from The Daily Bell

This is our point. The Anglosphere is NOT necessarily proving very effective fighting the "war on terror" overseas, and we wonder how much more "effective" it will be on the home front, should the powers-that-be decide to get more aggressive. At what point does someone decide all this is somewhat promotional rather than entirely realistic ....

I'm referring more to the feedbacks to this link than the story itself, of course.

Hope you are right with your suggestion that this so-called Internet Reformation "... may derail what is currently being created", but I am skeptical. In order for that to happen there would have to be nothing less than a modern day "Great Awakening", a spiritual awakening of millions of people across the globe. I realize that this has happened in times of crisis in the past, such as the two great awakenings of 18th century America ... maybe it could happen again.

Reply from The Daily Bell

Time will tell ...

DB - Thanks for reiterating this Wall Street/Central Banking obfuscation. That is an issue that bothers me every day.

When's the last time anyone blamed Frank Raines of Fannie Mae? Where we are is so silly. Somehow what is free in the financial market is commonly accepted to be evil; and what is commonly accepted to be benevolent is totalitarian. And we laugh at Hugo Chavez for being so obvious.

I guess it would just be taken as truth without all this "too much free speech" business.

It has been said that "desperate times call for desperate measures". I always felt the phrase to be nonsensical. However, at least since I bumped into the Bell, I tend to think that desperate times rather beget great minds ... at least this time.

I don't think we need the kind of awakening you refer to. All we really need is a tiny minority who is extremely doubtful of the illusion-makers and that is not afraid to say so openly. Any pressure or increased violence on the part of the PE will only increase the pressure on that little hole in the dam and create a flood--and certainly weaken the dam. Does that make any sense or am I getting too touchy-feely? (It's all that d*mn Yeats from yesterday... )

As it happened with the so called "fall of Communism", the same PE are at any time in the control of everything !

Remember 1953 Berlin- what did happened there and what did the western democracy and the Capitalism ! Nothing at all !

What did the Hungarian fight(1956) against the criminal Stalinian monster( PE) . Nothing, and all the world did nothing to help them.

What happened with the Prague Spring (1968) !! ?? Nothing , the all world did nothing.

Internet or not we all knew everything. And the result was the same: the PTB was stronger and stronger until they become the criminal capitalist western democracy!

We stay and make theoryies and citate poems and things like that.

What do you think is all about the EU-Top at this moment in Bruxelles !!?? If you tell me in the next 2 hours precisely what is all about I'll give you 2000 euro !

I know beter then Asange ! Much , much beter !!

Molly56 -

From my perspective, the forces at play are too powerful and too far along to be overcome by anything short of Divine Intervention. As I see it, a "tiny minority who is extremely doubtful" wouldn't be sufficient to be a game changer.
But then again, anything is possible.

A "tiny minority who is extremely doubtful" wouldn't be sufficient to be a game changer. But then again, anything is possible.

==] But then again, anything is possible, c.martel, when Evidence displaces doubt.

Click to view link

Good Morning, c.martel,

Regarding your perspective, would an Immaculate See vanquish any and all of those forces at play thought and/or pimped and/or madly imagined to be too powerful and too far along to be overcome by anything short of Divine Intervention.

The posit here, and please feel free to share it widely, is that it is easily so, and IT delivers what Immaculate Sees will be... ... . and Media presents the Phorms of ITs Realities on the Ground with ZerodDay Battles against Vulnerabilities opposing Opportunities and Progress.

I note that you are conflicted with your two polar opposite assertions ... ... "(1) As I see it, a "tiny minority who is extremely doubtful" wouldn't be sufficient to be a game changer.
(2)But then again, anything is possible."

For those who would struggle to accept the notion and reality of anything is possible, I would offer its big beautiful virtual sister mirror in magical and even shadowy black arts, nothing is impossible no matter however improbable.

Simple doubt, which is just really a product of a lack of necessary advanced future information for greater intelligence, and which also causes self-doubt, is the only barrier that remains to blight and refuse one full and unconditional acceptance of that fantastic reality which grants one the intelligence to exercise graceful powers to a heavenly degree in areas and in environments which would support such life styles.

Sadly, we need only look back 80yrs to Germany, to discover the ability of true evil to deceive and then enslave the masses. With a fervor resembling the orator, himself, BHO could whip the masses into a frenzy that would blind them to what is really taking place. The incompetent congress would,once again, choose to sit on the sidelines while the Constitution is reduced to a memory.

Are we to believe that neighbor would NOT turn on neighbor? "Look! The police are stopped in front of Bill's house. They're taking him away. Poor Mary and the kids. Glad it wasn't me."

This is not an indictment of all people, but merely the realization of the true self preservation instinct. No one belives it would happen to them until it has happened to many. This was the Nazi methodology and it is easily repeatable today, despite the internet. With sufficient division, (which I would argue that we have already)among the populace, it would take too long for the truth to reach a tipping point.

Government and its dependents love SWAG, the Stuff We All Get (from entrepreneurs). Although government excels at producing, or at least procuring, weapons and forms, government actually sucks big time donkey when it comes to creating swag. The Post Office is about as good as it gets when it comes to government swag.

Given that the government will always allow swag producers to live, the scary FEMA concentration camp meme begs the question "What's the most likely scenario?"

1. Government does nothing and simply continues to milk swag from its existing system.

2. Government shows initiative by building brand new FEMA communities for swag producers.

None would disagree that the OWS movement started somewhere. It was 'engineered'. None would disagree that it has evolved. The trend has been to import selective objectives by those that use the movement for their own personal 'critiques'. However, the movement has become an antipathy of middle order social desire for their utopianism. Indeed many sitting on the frills of OWS are not at all affected by the broadcast monitory collapse; but rather, see the possibility of becoming affected the more serious threat. This is good lateral thinking, but to understand the picture we must be clear on its makeup. There is a much deeper and precise cause. It is the squandering of opportunity, downsizing of the middle class, outsourcing of core manufacturing industry. As much as the fringe and mainstream media commentators have tried to present a 'defacto' Robin Hood (albeit the traditional 'Hollywood' account), the war is over opportunity.
In line with this Robin Hood-esque analysis, the right and left of the argument scope turns out a disorganized, headless rabble that evolved out of nothing - at one extreme. The other is even more farcical. At the other extreme the OWS is part of a tyrannical and ongoing plot of pharisaic Jewish elite (many who are neither Jewish nor have any understanding of pharisaic ideology) looking to impose a Zionist New World Order. Though I do not dispute that both assertion are in part correct, reality is much, much more complex and the ambitions and true belief of the stake holders are far from evident. Where as it is clear that the current progression of legislation on the back of the Patriot will change the game as it played, there are two stark realities. Firstly, in relation to 'cause and effect' the Patriot Act actually changed nothing. In fact I have cynically argued it has promoted greater transparency of those who 'get things done'. Secondly, if Guantanemo Bay has produced anything, it has been a PR disaster on all fronts. It did not have any bearing on anti-Islamic sentiment. It did not create a surge or cease fire in anti-west terrorist activities. It did have the effect of ensuring a more committed resilience to imperialist objectives in the Middle East. Thirdly, even the over quoted advocate of 'what might happen' Susan Lindauer has produced little more than hubble-bubble as to the 'threat' she posed to proscribed New World Order objectives. Her 'explosive' account of the so-called 911 event has been described by a learned colleague as yet more 'politically charged' bullshine. 911 is an example of a Zionist attack on America as a pretext for things to come. It can be nothing else.
The OWS movement might not have started thus, but it has become a save middle American revolt - a revolt that wants enough middle class jobs available for those who toil the university system. It wants America to be the land of opportunity and not an exploit for those behind cheap China. There is no doubt that, in the spirit of capitalism (is that another word for Judaism? I'll come back to that) that middle management has been systematically excised to support 'corporate gain' (or to cover up lack of efficiency), some traditional middle management roles pay less the workers, American corporations have outsourced their manufacturing operations to the Third World. As a result the salaries of the current elite children have grown disproportionately large, not measured against the working classes (not much has changed there), but when measured against the middle class. So taking aside the one percent analogy, actually the battleground and stake holders are not as described. To deal with the suggestion that the ready built concentration camps are for recipients of the proposed insidious legislation (as Susan Lindauer has so dutifully said) removing all 'rights'. Yet there are many secret prisons, as many not-so-secret ones, people disappear and die 'mysteriously' all the time. For instance, over the last decade alone in excess of 100 bio-scientists have died mysteriously. The hangover of Guantantemo with characters like the Australian David Hicks is ongoing. It is a thorn in the side for the current planners and an unlikely fate in the form of en-masse prosecutions of ex or current middle classes.
Practical further analysis must focus on three areas, culpability, complicity and conscience. All these words are deceptive because they are interpreted widely and differently. There is not a consensus. All laws are an abject failure if the 'deterrent' philosophy were the unilateral of the tyranny system (conveniently named justice system). People offend, reoffend, new people learn nothing from the 'mistakes' of others and continue to offend. Gauging current infrastructure, the worst that could happen is a rehash on Guantanemo Bay on the American middle class to put the 'fear of God' in those that protest. If that is the plan it is flawed thinking, because we can see from other criminals (who all were upright citizens before conviction) that far from having any impact, the justice system propagates a criminal class. Doing more than that would preempt a secondary problem - loyalty and treachery. Law enforcers are only human beings. If any mitigated attempt was made to askew the entire middle class there would be mutiny in the ranks at the very onset, for everyone would have a family member or loved one affected. So what of the purpose built concentration camps? Well, that is much more likely to be the master plan of the Eugenics movement who are determined to purge society of 'deviants'. Watch Dr Phil's game show and you will gain a glimpse of deviance to come.
The advocates of a grand 'once and for all' coup against the middle classes (in their present form), may well be encouraged by human nature in America. If a snapshot of narcissistic social behavior at all levels could be captured, none better example could be found than the New Orleans catastrophe. The catastrophe at New Orleans was not natural disaster. It was the failure of human beings to cooperate at a time of devastation. In fact it was worse than a failure to cooperate. American society is made up of jackals if New Orleans were its anthem. Unlike the floods in Brisbane, Australia where 'everyone pitched in' to assist those in need, without the capitulation of the 'establishment' New Orleans would have degenerated into something out of one of the Mad Max movies. As an outsider, I wonder how complicit the Occupy Wall Street movement is. To me it looks like a bunch of folks who expect the Lone Ranger and Tonto to come running to their aid as a result of their whining. Instead they are being presented a (currently empty) gun barrel. The silver screen has presented a pleasant fantastical scapegoat for all Americans up until now. The dream is clearly about to turn into a nightmare. If OWS is going to achieve anything its current status eludes it first must understand what it is, where the battle lines are and who is involved and why. This humble commentary has tried to expedite some of the worthy key notes.
To finish on the proposed concept of martial law, I prefer to call it marshal law. America needs to get real on what America is. The Wild West never disappeared. All that happened was priorities, vested interests and executors changed (or evolved). You are a gun toting, lynching society. You have decided you will get your way no matter what as your way is 'the way'. As far as you are concerned anyone who doesn't like your way, well they might as well be dead - indeed the deader the better. You already have marshal law organized by private militias. The intention is to 'rubber stamp' that arrangement via martial law. Marshals were individuals from the old Wild West given the license to arbitrarily kill. They were judge, juror and executioner, as it were. The Hebrew word for judge sounds like 'marshal'. Taking the Ten Commandments..no room sorry