News & Analysis
Foment OWS Terror, Open Camps?
#OccupyWallStreet Officially Classified As Terrorist Group Along With Al-Qaeda ... As I previously reported, the US Army is being mobilized to crush Occupy Wall Street and the recent passage of the National Defense Authorization Act opens the door for the military to arrest and detain American citizens indefinitely without trial. We now have our first confirmation that Occupy Wall Street is being labeled as a Domestic Terrorist Threat and protestors now being labeled as possible domestic terrorists. Don't hesitate to think for a single second that agencies across the entire US agencies haven't already done the same exact thing. Perhaps more alarming is the photo of the original police document that has secretly handed "trusted" anti-terrorism partners has been removed from twitter. – Alexander Higgins' blog
Dominant Social Theme: Once we create terror, we can incarcerate the terrorists.
Free-Market Analysis: As dedicated analysts of elite dominant social themes, we've been following the recent protests that started on Wall Street and have now spread around the world. We have long since come to the conclusion they have been fomented in support of a larger elite dominant social theme: Wall Street bad; lawyers good.
But perhaps there is a much darker side to what's going on. It is pretty much an established fact by now that the current round of protests was a product of the leftist Adbusters magazine, which is funded by elite enablers like George Soros.
We have pointed out that the protests are intended to move attention away from the proximate cause of modern financial disasters (central banks printing money-from-nothing) to "Wall Street" and Goldman Sachs and other facilities that promote Anglosphere elite goals but are not in charge of the larger conspiracy.
The conspiracy to run the world seems to emanate from a small group of banking families that control central banks along with their associates and enablers. This group – a cartel or mafia with religious and cultural homogeneity – creates war and chaos in order to build their longed-for new world order.
The current protests are likely part of the chaos that apparently is being willfully created by this power elite. The protests are the outgrowth of the larger chaos and the unrolling Great Recession, which is providing the proximate cause for the current European roll-up of "Merkozy."
The idea is that economic stress gives rise to protests that in turn justify wars and authoritarian crackdowns. We can see in the excerpt above from Higgins's blog that OWS has apparently been classified as a terrorist organization now in the City of London. He even produces a memo on his site to support his contention.
Likewise, Alex Jones's websites recently produced what is claimed to be an Obama administration operative memorandum authorizing the opening of various FEMA prison-camp sites throughout the US. The camp sites have never, apparently, been fully confirmed by the US government, though it is true that the Bush Administration did authorize Halliburton to build various detention facilities in the mid-2000s.
Additionally, legal cover for the roundup of "terrorists" – anybody that the US government wants to define as one – is being provided by congressional legislation that allows for military arrests, detention and even torture without trial. We covered that here: NDAA, Smell of Fear.
We thus come full circle, as we often do when analyzing the memes of the Anglosphere elite. It is not enough simply to produce fear-based promotions. They must be actuated. In this case the actuation would seem to be the current round of "controlled' protests via OWS.
What is going on now also puts the so-called "war on terror" into a more logical perspective. While the war on terror has been something of a failure in terms of providing enough horror to truly terrify Western populations, it now appears as if it may not need to.
The War on Terror plus the domestic US protests are apparently to provide the powers that be with the ability to detain people at will around the world and in the US, too. Of course, there is yet another proverbial shoe to drop as well ...
We've reported on what we believe to be upcoming Pecora Hearings (re-warmed 1930s hearings aimed at Wall Street) as a result. The idea, once again, is to whitewash central banking participation in the ongoing, deepening "Great Recession" of the 2000s.
The New York Federal Reserve, in particular, oversaw monetary inflation in the Roaring Twenties that gave way to the Depression in the 1930s once the artificial bubble burst. Panicked, Franklin Delano Roosevelt first declared bank holidays and then confiscated gold to make sure that people wouldn't turn in their Federal Reserve notes (dollars) for non-existent gold.
Once FDR and his central banking cronies had ensured that they would not be formally exposed, they tackled the next problem – who was to blame? After running through several prosecutors (much as Lincoln ran through generals until he found a suitably bloody one, Grant) FDR settled on Ferdinand Pecora and the famous Pecora Hearings began.
The Pecora Hearings produced the current rigmarole of securities agencies that have been exported around the world in much the manner of central banking. Securities Exchange Commissions are sprouting up everywhere, all of them purporting to make markets "safer and fairer," though none of them do.
This seems to be the way the Anglosphere power elite works. They create economic chaos and then use it to create wars and additional authoritarianism. It is all part of a larger effort at creating what we call "directed history."
The power elite controls governments around the world, especially Western governments. Thus, it needs only manufacture a crisis in order to come up with a solution. Then its paid and craven enablers "write" the historical narrative. Future generations are not supposed to understand how badly they've been fooled.
The current narrative, when it is written (hypothetically, anyway), will leave out the central bankers' role in creating the current economic crisis. In fact, upcoming "Pecora-style" Hearings will be very important to the elite. It is through these phony hearings that they will be able to create market-based culpability.
So ... future generations will learn that Wall Street was responsible for the economic chaos of the early 21st century even though it was central banking initiated (by power elite central banks). Then these unborn generations will learn that Wall Street's bad actions spawned a backlash against "capitalist" greed.
What would be left out is that the power elite itself first created the crisis and then fomented the protests via controlled facilities such as Adbusters. Additionally, future generations might learn that the protests got out of hand, necessitating the actuation of FEMA camps.
Future generations may learn, in fact, that the chaos and anarchy that prevailed in the early 21st century gave opportunities to international terrorism, which in turn necessitated crackdowns and the suspension of civil rights and freedoms.
Probably, the suspension of civil rights would be cast as a "mistake" or overreaction. But none of this is a mistake. We can watch it being built, step by step. The Internet has made it possible.
It is the Internet, in our view, that is the "wild card" in all of this. Too many people are aware, we believe, of the deliberateness of the current civil and military insanity. Too many people are aware of the way global government is coming into being. And many do not like it.
Conclusion: Thus, as we have concluded before, it is the Internet Reformation itself that may derail what is currently being created. Directed history can indeed be implemented, but if too many people are aware of the manipulations, then it may be neither effective nor long-lasting. This is the conflict that is being played out now. Fortunes will be won or lost. And lives as well.
Posted by OzzieThinker on 12/12/11 11:50 PM
None would disagree that the OWS movement started somewhere. It was 'engineered'. None would disagree that it has evolved. The trend has been to import selective objectives by those that use the movement for their own personal 'critiques'. However, the movement has become an antipathy of middle order social desire for their utopianism. Indeed many sitting on the frills of OWS are not at all affected by the broadcast monitory collapse; but rather, see the possibility of becoming affected the more serious threat. This is good lateral thinking, but to understand the picture we must be clear on its makeup. There is a much deeper and precise cause. It is the squandering of opportunity, downsizing of the middle class, outsourcing of core manufacturing industry. As much as the fringe and mainstream media commentators have tried to present a 'defacto' Robin Hood (albeit the traditional 'Hollywood' account), the war is over opportunity.
In line with this Robin Hood-esque analysis, the right and left of the argument scope turns out a disorganized, headless rabble that evolved out of nothing - at one extreme. The other is even more farcical. At the other extreme the OWS is part of a tyrannical and ongoing plot of pharisaic Jewish elite (many who are neither Jewish nor have any understanding of pharisaic ideology) looking to impose a Zionist New World Order. Though I do not dispute that both assertion are in part correct, reality is much, much more complex and the ambitions and true belief of the stake holders are far from evident. Where as it is clear that the current progression of legislation on the back of the Patriot will change the game as it played, there are two stark realities. Firstly, in relation to 'cause and effect' the Patriot Act actually changed nothing. In fact I have cynically argued it has promoted greater transparency of those who 'get things done'. Secondly, if Guantanemo Bay has produced anything, it has been a PR disaster on all fronts. It did not have any bearing on anti-Islamic sentiment. It did not create a surge or cease fire in anti-west terrorist activities. It did have the effect of ensuring a more committed resilience to imperialist objectives in the Middle East. Thirdly, even the over quoted advocate of 'what might happen' Susan Lindauer has produced little more than hubble-bubble as to the 'threat' she posed to proscribed New World Order objectives. Her 'explosive' account of the so-called 911 event has been described by a learned colleague as yet more 'politically charged' bullshine. 911 is an example of a Zionist attack on America as a pretext for things to come. It can be nothing else.
The OWS movement might not have started thus, but it has become a save middle American revolt - a revolt that wants enough middle class jobs available for those who toil the university system. It wants America to be the land of opportunity and not an exploit for those behind cheap China. There is no doubt that, in the spirit of capitalism (is that another word for Judaism? I'll come back to that) that middle management has been systematically excised to support 'corporate gain' (or to cover up lack of efficiency), some traditional middle management roles pay less the workers, American corporations have outsourced their manufacturing operations to the Third World. As a result the salaries of the current elite children have grown disproportionately large, not measured against the working classes (not much has changed there), but when measured against the middle class. So taking aside the one percent analogy, actually the battleground and stake holders are not as described. To deal with the suggestion that the ready built concentration camps are for recipients of the proposed insidious legislation (as Susan Lindauer has so dutifully said) removing all 'rights'. Yet there are many secret prisons, as many not-so-secret ones, people disappear and die 'mysteriously' all the time. For instance, over the last decade alone in excess of 100 bio-scientists have died mysteriously. The hangover of Guantantemo with characters like the Australian David Hicks is ongoing. It is a thorn in the side for the current planners and an unlikely fate in the form of en-masse prosecutions of ex or current middle classes.
Practical further analysis must focus on three areas, culpability, complicity and conscience. All these words are deceptive because they are interpreted widely and differently. There is not a consensus. All laws are an abject failure if the 'deterrent' philosophy were the unilateral of the tyranny system (conveniently named justice system). People offend, reoffend, new people learn nothing from the 'mistakes' of others and continue to offend. Gauging current infrastructure, the worst that could happen is a rehash on Guantanemo Bay on the American middle class to put the 'fear of God' in those that protest. If that is the plan it is flawed thinking, because we can see from other criminals (who all were upright citizens before conviction) that far from having any impact, the justice system propagates a criminal class. Doing more than that would preempt a secondary problem - loyalty and treachery. Law enforcers are only human beings. If any mitigated attempt was made to askew the entire middle class there would be mutiny in the ranks at the very onset, for everyone would have a family member or loved one affected. So what of the purpose built concentration camps? Well, that is much more likely to be the master plan of the Eugenics movement who are determined to purge society of 'deviants'. Watch Dr Phil's game show and you will gain a glimpse of deviance to come.
The advocates of a grand 'once and for all' coup against the middle classes (in their present form), may well be encouraged by human nature in America. If a snapshot of narcissistic social behavior at all levels could be captured, none better example could be found than the New Orleans catastrophe. The catastrophe at New Orleans was not natural disaster. It was the failure of human beings to cooperate at a time of devastation. In fact it was worse than a failure to cooperate. American society is made up of jackals if New Orleans were its anthem. Unlike the floods in Brisbane, Australia where 'everyone pitched in' to assist those in need, without the capitulation of the 'establishment' New Orleans would have degenerated into something out of one of the Mad Max movies. As an outsider, I wonder how complicit the Occupy Wall Street movement is. To me it looks like a bunch of folks who expect the Lone Ranger and Tonto to come running to their aid as a result of their whining. Instead they are being presented a (currently empty) gun barrel. The silver screen has presented a pleasant fantastical scapegoat for all Americans up until now. The dream is clearly about to turn into a nightmare. If OWS is going to achieve anything its current status eludes it first must understand what it is, where the battle lines are and who is involved and why. This humble commentary has tried to expedite some of the worthy key notes.
To finish on the proposed concept of martial law, I prefer to call it marshal law. America needs to get real on what America is. The Wild West never disappeared. All that happened was priorities, vested interests and executors changed (or evolved). You are a gun toting, lynching society. You have decided you will get your way no matter what as your way is 'the way'. As far as you are concerned anyone who doesn't like your way, well they might as well be dead - indeed the deader the better. You already have marshal law organized by private militias. The intention is to 'rubber stamp' that arrangement via martial law. Marshals were individuals from the old Wild West given the license to arbitrarily kill. They were judge, juror and executioner, as it were. The Hebrew word for judge sounds like 'marshal'. Taking the Ten Commandments..no room sorry
Posted by Don from the Republic of Lakotah on 12/09/11 11:57 AM
Government and its dependents love SWAG, the Stuff We All Get (from entrepreneurs). Although government excels at producing, or at least procuring, weapons and forms, government actually sucks big time donkey when it comes to creating swag. The Post Office is about as good as it gets when it comes to government swag.
Given that the government will always allow swag producers to live, the scary FEMA concentration camp meme begs the question "What's the most likely scenario?"
1. Government does nothing and simply continues to milk swag from its existing system.
2. Government shows initiative by building brand new FEMA communities for swag producers.
Posted by JeffC on 12/09/11 09:55 AM
Sadly, we need only look back 80yrs to Germany, to discover the ability of true evil to deceive and then enslave the masses. With a fervor resembling the orator, himself, BHO could whip the masses into a frenzy that would blind them to what is really taking place. The incompetent congress would,once again, choose to sit on the sidelines while the Constitution is reduced to a memory.
Are we to believe that neighbor would NOT turn on neighbor? "Look! The police are stopped in front of Bill's house. They're taking him away. Poor Mary and the kids. Glad it wasn't me."
This is not an indictment of all people, but merely the realization of the true self preservation instinct. No one belives it would happen to them until it has happened to many. This was the Nazi methodology and it is easily repeatable today, despite the internet. With sufficient division, (which I would argue that we have already)among the populace, it would take too long for the truth to reach a tipping point.
Posted by amanfromMars on 12/09/11 05:23 AM
Good Morning, c.martel,
Regarding your perspective, would an Immaculate See vanquish any and all of those forces at play thought and/or pimped and/or madly imagined to be too powerful and too far along to be overcome by anything short of Divine Intervention.
The posit here, and please feel free to share it widely, is that it is easily so, and IT delivers what Immaculate Sees will be... ... . and Media presents the Phorms of ITs Realities on the Ground with ZerodDay Battles against Vulnerabilities opposing Opportunities and Progress.
I note that you are conflicted with your two polar opposite assertions ... ... "(1) As I see it, a "tiny minority who is extremely doubtful" wouldn't be sufficient to be a game changer.
(2)But then again, anything is possible."
For those who would struggle to accept the notion and reality of anything is possible, I would offer its big beautiful virtual sister mirror in magical and even shadowy black arts, nothing is impossible no matter however improbable.
Simple doubt, which is just really a product of a lack of necessary advanced future information for greater intelligence, and which also causes self-doubt, is the only barrier that remains to blight and refuse one full and unconditional acceptance of that fantastic reality which grants one the intelligence to exercise graceful powers to a heavenly degree in areas and in environments which would support such life styles.
Posted by Pete 8 on 12/09/11 01:45 AM
A "tiny minority who is extremely doubtful" wouldn't be sufficient to be a game changer. But then again, anything is possible.
==] But then again, anything is possible, c.martel, when Evidence displaces doubt.
Click to view link
Posted by c.martel on 12/08/11 08:11 PM
From my perspective, the forces at play are too powerful and too far along to be overcome by anything short of Divine Intervention. As I see it, a "tiny minority who is extremely doubtful" wouldn't be sufficient to be a game changer.
But then again, anything is possible.
Posted by alexsemen on 12/08/11 07:34 PM
As it happened with the so called "fall of Communism", the same PE are at any time in the control of everything !
Remember 1953 Berlin- what did happened there and what did the western democracy and the Capitalism ! Nothing at all !
What did the Hungarian fight(1956) against the criminal Stalinian monster( PE) . Nothing, and all the world did nothing to help them.
What happened with the Prague Spring (1968) !! ?? Nothing , the all world did nothing.
Internet or not we all knew everything. And the result was the same: the PTB was stronger and stronger until they become the criminal capitalist western democracy!
We stay and make theoryies and citate poems and things like that.
What do you think is all about the EU-Top at this moment in Bruxelles !!?? If you tell me in the next 2 hours precisely what is all about I'll give you 2000 euro !
I know beter then Asange ! Much , much beter !!
Posted by Molly56 on 12/08/11 05:21 PM
I don't think we need the kind of awakening you refer to. All we really need is a tiny minority who is extremely doubtful of the illusion-makers and that is not afraid to say so openly. Any pressure or increased violence on the part of the PE will only increase the pressure on that little hole in the dam and create a flood--and certainly weaken the dam. Does that make any sense or am I getting too touchy-feely? (It's all that d*mn Yeats from yesterday... )
Posted by Abu Aardvark on 12/08/11 02:11 PM
It has been said that "desperate times call for desperate measures". I always felt the phrase to be nonsensical. However, at least since I bumped into the Bell, I tend to think that desperate times rather beget great minds ... at least this time.
Posted by Dilence Sogwood on 12/08/11 01:07 PM
DB - Thanks for reiterating this Wall Street/Central Banking obfuscation. That is an issue that bothers me every day.
When's the last time anyone blamed Frank Raines of Fannie Mae? Where we are is so silly. Somehow what is free in the financial market is commonly accepted to be evil; and what is commonly accepted to be benevolent is totalitarian. And we laugh at Hugo Chavez for being so obvious.
I guess it would just be taken as truth without all this "too much free speech" business.
Posted by c.martel on 12/08/11 12:38 PM
Hope you are right with your suggestion that this so-called Internet Reformation "... may derail what is currently being created", but I am skeptical. In order for that to happen there would have to be nothing less than a modern day "Great Awakening", a spiritual awakening of millions of people across the globe. I realize that this has happened in times of crisis in the past, such as the two great awakenings of 18th century America ... maybe it could happen again.
Reply from The Daily Bell
Time will tell ...
Posted by Molly56 on 12/08/11 12:26 PM
I'm referring more to the feedbacks to this link than the story itself, of course.
Posted by Don from the Republic of Lakotah on 12/08/11 12:24 PM
Hammond says UK not seeking 'perfect Afghanistan' (BBC News - ?4 hours ago?)
NATO fuel tankers torched in Pakistan attack (CBS News - ?3 minutes ago?)
Yemen: Al-Qaeda-Linked Militants Attack Army, 10 Killed (Huffington Post - ?1 hour ago)
Somalia fighting: New clashes in capital Mogadishu (BBC News - ?7 hours ago?)
Enough of pessimism!
'The Three Stooges' Trailer: Larry David and Snooki Get Eye Gouged (Video)
Click to view link
Reply from The Daily Bell
This is our point. The Anglosphere is NOT necessarily proving very effective fighting the "war on terror" overseas, and we wonder how much more "effective" it will be on the home front, should the powers-that-be decide to get more aggressive. At what point does someone decide all this is somewhat promotional rather than entirely realistic ....
Posted by Molly56 on 12/08/11 12:24 PM
By pure cooincidence, I was watching an old documentary last month about China and it included the Tiananmen Square incident] I was struck by the odd similarity with the progress of the OWS protests to what we know of the Chinese protests.
I just thought it was my overactive imagination, but couldn't shake off the feeling that that was a controlled "history" also. I remember some Youtube videos that claim to debunk the "tank man" situation. (anomolies, etc.) So after reading your article I did a search and came up with this: (Mainstream media, even)
Click to view link
It would be sad to think that the Chinese "massacre" weren't one after all--it's such an inspiring story. But could OWS be a kind of set up for an exaggerated "false flag" event that doesn't really happen? After all, these days it matters less "what happened" than what we're made to believe "happened".
Reply from The Daily Bell
When it comes to the "modern day" and what we call directed history, more and more we come down on the side of "anything's possible."
Posted by Don from the Republic of Lakotah on 12/08/11 11:44 AM
Any FEMA roundup promises to be as effective as the ongoing overseas terrorist roundup where the powers-that-be deployed the very latest in military might.
Reply from The Daily Bell
Afghanistan? Pakistan? Yemen? Somalia? ...
Posted by Jeanna on 12/08/11 10:58 AM
Yeah, I've been getting these urges for a while to get of Dodge. They are becoming near to impossible to ignore when our "honorable" legislators feel justified in voting for the NDAA.
Posted by EntropyAnn on 12/08/11 10:43 AM
Well you know what they say... .when someone accuses you of being evil, you'd best not disappoint. It does seem as though no good contingencies have been planned for when the power elite move things into the next phase of operations, however. Disappointing...
Posted by Jeanna on 12/08/11 10:38 AM
But how many of us get thrown into the FEMA camps first? And the staffing is supposed to be ready in February. Are they just going to round up protestors, or will they go after those of us who have been vocal on the net?
Reply from The Daily Bell
Dear Jeanna, you seem to be anticipating an urgency that does not exist yet ... The intention to "round up" people may far exceed the capacity or its realistic application ...
Posted by Don from the Republic of Lakotah on 12/08/11 10:10 AM
"Then its paid and craven enablers 'write' the historical narrative."
Getting one's historical narrative pitch accepted as authentically authoritative may prove somewhat difficult in this era of fractured mass media.
Reply from The Daily Bell